Originally posted by gingerjedi
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Baby P
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Yet more results of HMG incompetence !!
The employee that complained had written a letter to ministers. Due to REORGANISATION of the Department by HMG, the letter got lost in the system.
Reorganisation seems to be Labour's achilles heel, because we all know what reorganisation of the BofE and regulators achieved with regard to the credit crunch.
Comment
-
I can't agree with that, Some people do have the capacity for evil, and I think these people do.Originally posted by Ruprect View PostFor anyone to do this to a defenceless child I think they must be mentally ill...Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Definitely agree wholeheartedly that having kids changes your whole outlook. I've never got this wound up about other similar news stories before.
I can't stand Brown's usual dour demeanour towards this issue. He should have read the mood of the general public and been hopping up and down when speaking about this - a bit like Cameron at PMQ the other day.
As it is, we just get "it is very tragic but we have to wait for the results of the in-depth investigation".
I'm not demanding a witch-hunt and spurious firings, but we need passion from those up top and a real feeling that they are actually going to do something about this.
Haringey Council are really pissing me off too. They've issued an injunction to stop the former social worker who raised concerns from speaking out and steadfastly saying "there is nothing more we could have done to prevent this"
Issue one: if they're saying this before the conclusions of the investigation then to me it just means that they are saving ass and will try to hinder any meaningful change
Issue two: the job of the social workers was child protection. If a child dies in circumstances like this, they have failed. It doesn't matter if procedures were followed, if a child dies like this when procedures are followed then the procedures are wrong and need sorting out ASAP.
Stop hiding behind press releases and trying to save your own careers. SIXTY times they visited this child.Comment
-
I was unlucky enough to read the guardian yesterday. they accused joe public of hypocracy. either we want no nanny state or nannies everywhere - they claim.
personally I just want social workers to do their job.Comment
-
I read about this online last friday and had to go home early to hug my kids as I felt almost physically sick. after I put my little ones to bed I had a large stiff drink or three - which only made me cry.
Looking at the times today made it worse as he was a beautiful little boy.
If a senior Policeman and senior hospital consultants are ignored, then really what on earth can be done ?
Was there no continuity/persistance on the part of the Social Services ?Comment
-
That's a pretty depressing outlook DA as it implies there is no hope. I prefer to think no matter how dark some things are there is always a way back.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostIt is likely that the mother and both men were themselves abused as children and thus part of an unbreakable circle of degradation and violence.Comment
-
The only time Gordon Brown ever really cared about child welfare was after his missus miscarried. Suddenly he cared passionately about child welfare, the NHs etc. Then his missus had a kid and he went back to being a politicianWho has time? Who has time? But then if we do not ever take time, how can we ever have time?Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI was unlucky enough to read the guardian yesterday. they accused joe public of hypocracy. either we want no nanny state or nannies everywhere - they claim.
personally I just want social workers to do their job.
All we want is for these useless Social Workers to do their job. This kid was seen 60 times and injuries were visible on just about every occasion. Why pay them 100,000 quid for doing nothing!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Dalek View PostThe worst thing is that there'll be others (probably dozens) undergoing the same thing. How the council legally gagged the employee is beyond my understanding.
Official Secrets Act I would imagine. This is to protect our incompetent HMG, make no mistake!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Today 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Yesterday 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01

Comment