• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Silliest IT buzzword ever - "the Cloud"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
    One Sigma = 690,000 DPMO* = 31% efficiency
    Two Sigma = 308,000 DPMO = 69.2% efficiency
    Three Sigma = 66,800 DPMO = 93.32% efficiency
    Four Sigma = 6,210 DPMO = 99.379% efficiency
    Five Sigma = 230 DPMO = 99.977% efficiency
    Six Sigma = 3.4 DPMO = 99.9997% efficiency

    *Defective Parts per Million Opportunities

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma
    In pure stats, that's not right: +- sigma on a normal distribution includes about 68% so is about 68% efficiency, or 32% "defective". ISTR that 2 sigma covers about 95% and 3 sigma very roughly 99.5%.

    But I see from wikipedia that "an empirically-based 1.5 sigma shift is introduced into the calculation". Aye, right.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by expat View Post
      But I see from wikipedia that "an empirically-based 1.5 sigma shift is introduced into the calculation". Aye, right.
      Yeah, those numbers are due to the somewhat contentious 1.5 sigma shift.
      Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

      Comment


        #63
        Every cloud has a silver lining - so it's a way of making money, you see.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #64
          It's all bulltulip... the lot of it.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Diestl View Post
            It's all bulltulip... the lot of it.
            WHS
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment

            Working...
            X