Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Osbourne scandal
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostI never said I would, I just pointed out that you what you said could be interpreted as saying SAS was not concerned about how honestly he made his money.
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostConsidering the fuss you made when a post suggested you might be less than honest you may want to consider why this argument is being continued, or why SAS made his original reply.
First I was named personally and link was made to my business.
Secondly I was accused of dishonesty in running my business, this was totally baseless claim that I was forced to deal with since there was clear link to my name/business.
There was neither in the case of sas - in fact my phrase did not even mean him at all, I thought it was obvious since he hasn't got billions or millions, and even if he had I stated pretty clearly that being ethical/honest in effect makes it less likely (or harder) to make so much money. It's generic observation, perhaps the Union of Billionaires can bring up a claim on behalf of their members. I doubt sas is the member though, not even associate.
Also I tried to reason with the person and explained why they were wrong - I did not threaten to sue, at the end I said it could lead to libel case that he'd lose for sure. From my side I was confident that the case was there and I could win in court, and I was ready to carry it through if necessary, it's not something I like - I was in court once in this country and I won, but it takes too much energy and money, for me it is really the last resort. That's why I don't like or make baseless threats of that nature - I would go on record now saying that people who make baseless legal threats that they don't intend to carry out are acting, in my view, less than honestly - it certainly not ethical, in my view, practice and should be avoided.Last edited by AtW; 22 October 2008, 15:52.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt would be wrong interpretation on too many levels to bother to argue here.
That was a totally different matter.
First I was named personally and link was made to my business.
Secondly I was accused of dishonesty in running my business, this was totally baseless claim that I was forced to deal with since there was clear link to my name/business.
Also I tried to reason with the person and explained why they were wrong - I did not threaten to sue, at the end I said it could lead to libel case that he'd lose for sure. From my side I was confident that the case was there and I could win in court, and I was ready to carry it through if necessary, it's not something I like - I was in court once in this country and I won, but it takes too much energy and money, for me it is really the last resort. That's why I don't like or make baseless threats of that nature - I would go on record now saying that people who make baseless legal threats that they don't intend to carry out are acting, in my view, less than honestly - it certainly not ethical, in my view, practice and should be avoided.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt would be wrong interpretation on too many levels to bother to argue here.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt would be wrong interpretation on too many levels to bother to argue here. I am confident however that if I was in court I would have been able to argue my points successfully. If you are not confident you could do it yourself then don't make legal threats, because someone sometime will call you bluff on this and it will cost you in losing face or losing court case.
That was a totally different matter.
First I was named personally and link was made to my business.
Secondly I was accused of dishonesty in running my business, this was totally baseless claim that I was forced to deal with since there was clear link to my name/business.
There was neither in the case of sas - in fact my phrase did not even mean him at all, I thought it was obvious since he hasn't got billions or millions, and even if he had I stated pretty clearly that being ethical/honest in effect makes it less likely (or harder) to make so much money. It's generic observation, perhaps the Union of Billionaires can bring up a claim on behalf of their members. I doubt sas is the member though, not even associate.
Also I tried to reason with the person and explained why they were wrong - I did not threaten to sue, at the end I said it could lead to libel case that he'd lose for sure. From my side I was confident that the case was there and I could win in court, and I was ready to carry it through if necessary, it's not something I like - I was in court once in this country and I won, but it takes too much energy and money, for me it is really the last resort. That's why I don't like or make baseless threats of that nature - I would go on record now saying that people who make baseless legal threats that they don't intend to carry out are acting, in my view, less than honestly - it certainly not ethical, in my view, practice and should be avoided.ǝןqqıʍComment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostRemind me again what you said about not being a native speaker and how that made my argument valueless. How would you know if that were a wrong interpretation? Or are you now claiming to be a master of the English language and all its nuances?
Anyway, I am off now, I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostAnyway, I am off now, I'll let the readers come to their own conclusions.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Originally posted by snaw View PostDude, you need to go out and get yourself a blowjob.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostLook snaw, your words as you say them don't bother me, that's your personal opinion, however how would you feel like if someone on this forum posted your real name, link to place where you work and accused you falsely of being dishonest, basically defrauding your clients/employers? That really crossed the line and I argued patiently at first to clear up the issue, it was not something I wanted to happen or deal with, just like now I am forced into this stupid conversation when it is obvious there is no libel case whatsoever yet some members of this esteemed board seem intent to continue.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostMost will come to the only conclusion possible: you've lost your marbles.
There sure plenty of people out there who are dishonest and unethical, yet they do not have billions or millions.
Off to do something useful now.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment