Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More Hyundai woes
Collapse
X
-
Thing about electric motors is that the (currently) have to have batteries attached to them which (currently) weigh a fair bit."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
Electric motors are light, batteries however aren't. Hydrocarbon fuels are much lighter than batteries for an equivalent amount of energy and a lot easier to transport and install in a vehicle for refueling purposes.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostRoll on electric cars which will presumably be a lot simpler and easier to fix than the infernal combustion engine and the increasing complexity used to get diminishing returns on fuel economy. Electric motors are circa 90% efficient, compared to petrol engines that probably won't beat 30% or so even if they are packed full with electronic gizmos. Electric motors are lighter too, which means a lighter body which means a smaller and lighter motor...and you get to die in a head-on collision and squished by a juggernaut. The last is not such a good selling point.Comment
-
Yeah, petrol is hard to beat on energy density. About 10 times what the best batteries currently manage. But petrol engines deliver around 3/4 kW power per kg and an electric motor delivers around 8 times that power by weight, so a slight weight saving there. Electric cars may be practical for shorter distances where the batteries could be quite small and light and charged overnight, or perhaps in a more distant future, for ultra high performance at more modest prices than having a monster engine.Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostElectric motors are light, batteries however aren't. Hydrocarbon fuels are much lighter than batteries for an equivalent amount of energy and a lot easier to transport and install in a vehicle for refueling purposes.Comment
-
I was quite tempted by that electric moped that was launched recently, but you need to charge it under cover so it was impractical for us.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostYeah, petrol is hard to beat on energy density. About 10 times what the best batteries currently manage. But petrol engines deliver around 3/4 kW power per kg and an electric motor delivers around 8 times that power by weight, so a slight weight saving there. Electric cars may be practical for shorter distances where the batteries could be quite small and light and charged overnight, or perhaps in a more distant future, for ultra high performance at more modest prices than having a monster engine."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
I doubt that electric cars will become truly practical until fuel cells become viable and hydrogen available at fueling stations.
Batteries take hours to charge where as a tank of liquid fuel takes minutes. Plus of course what fuel do you use to generate the electricity in the first place?Comment
-
I'm quite tempted by an electric bike, but would feel foolish using itOriginally posted by Moscow Mule View PostI was quite tempted by that electric moped that was launched recently, but you need to charge it under cover so it was impractical for us.
Comment
-
Finance! You used finance to buy a Hyundai?Originally posted by Moose423956 View PostWaiting for them to tell me what they'll give me in PX. Still owe £2500 on the finance, so anything less than that and I'm screwed.
Don't know whether to
or
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
The same drawback applies to hydrogen, since it's not a primary energy source and has to be created by some means, or extracted from fossil fuels. Hydrogen has big problems with storage too though so I don't think that's looking like it's on the cards. We may [speculation mode] be entering an electricity age though, where we use less fossil fuels and more electrical energy sources, e.g. nuclear [/speculation mode].Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostI doubt that electric cars will become truly practical until fuel cells become viable and hydrogen available at fueling stations.
Batteries take hours to charge where as a tank of liquid fuel takes minutes. Plus of course what fuel do you use to generate the electricity in the first place?Comment
-
Rather than charge batteries would it not be more convenient to swap battery packs and always have one on charge?Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
Batteries take hours to charge where as a tank of liquid fuel takes minutes. Plus of course what fuel do you use to generate the electricity in the first place?
Or for liquid batteries, drain the spent electrolyte and refill with charged electrolyte (much like filling with petrol)?
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment