Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dragonfly
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
IR35 is so crazy and unfair...
If this guy was in fact an "employee" then surely isn’t it up to the AA to pay up for all the missing employers’ national insurance for their "employee" ??
It seems now it’s extremely wise to get insurance against this sort of outcome.Comment
-
You are in a very very small minority. Most builders will just send in their sub without even bothering to tell you, let alone ask.Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostThis cant be good
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/003948.html
Dragonfly had a substitution clause but it was fettered and therefore didn't count. My builder has to agree any sub he sends, I will not let just anyone on site and I check the quals and experience even of his navvies..
This is the card that they have which makes them unquestionably self employed. I'm surprised that they even bother to take on business that doesn't let them play it, there wasn't a shortage of work for them to do.
timComment
-
I take issue with the "he allowed".Originally posted by Diver View PostIt would appear that Mr Bessel allowed himself to be tied in by contract to AA rather than Dragonfly as a whole. He allowed Client control of his duties and attendance, Close supervision and control of his working procedures, including spot testing and overseeing of his work,
.
In what I do, you have two choices, accept work on this basis or don't work. He is obviously in the same position, what is he supposed to do?
timComment
-
99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
-
I agree. This is the beginning of the end. I do not believe a change in Gov't will save us either in 2010. Shame.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
He's supposed to pay the right amount of tax from the start.Originally posted by tim123 View PostIn what I do, you have two choices, accept work on this basis or don't work. He is obviously in the same position, what is he supposed to do?
Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
It's not finished yet. Next step really depends on Jon wanting to carry on fighting, but if he does there are a variety of next steps.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!
Also, just for the doomsayers out there, the appeal failed becasue the original decision was entirely consistent with case law. What it wasn't, but what can't be appealed, was a correct interpretation of the reality on the ground. This loss is a disappointment in many ways, but it is by no means an end point.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Hahaha! The lad has a near 100k tax bill to find. Wonder if he took out a CTD? Unless Im mistaken, the only appeal would be to the HoL. Can you see PCGfunding that for him too?Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt's not finished yet. Next step really depends on Jon wanting to carry on fighting, but if he does there are a variety of next steps.
Also, just for the doomsayers out there, the appeal failed becasue the original decision was entirely consistent with case law. What it wasn't, but what can't be appealed, was a correct interpretation of the reality on the ground. This loss is a disappointment in many ways, but it is by no means an end point.
I disagree about the decision being 'entirely' consistent with case law. Case law has actually built up a number of sound defences for IR35. And that's before one even considers the inconsistency between SC decision.
After having slagged off the MP boys, sounds to me like your running scared because Hector is now gunning for you too.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid! You're next, pal.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
-
Whats the track record of the insurance companies paying out if you lose then ?
Seems like some people think they will just find away of not paying up....
Trying to work out if its worth getting...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment