Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dragonfly
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
IR35 is so crazy and unfair...
If this guy was in fact an "employee" then surely isn’t it up to the AA to pay up for all the missing employers’ national insurance for their "employee" ??
It seems now it’s extremely wise to get insurance against this sort of outcome.Comment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostThis cant be good
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/003948.html
Dragonfly had a substitution clause but it was fettered and therefore didn't count. My builder has to agree any sub he sends, I will not let just anyone on site and I check the quals and experience even of his navvies..
This is the card that they have which makes them unquestionably self employed. I'm surprised that they even bother to take on business that doesn't let them play it, there wasn't a shortage of work for them to do.
timComment
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostIt would appear that Mr Bessel allowed himself to be tied in by contract to AA rather than Dragonfly as a whole. He allowed Client control of his duties and attendance, Close supervision and control of his working procedures, including spot testing and overseeing of his work,
.
In what I do, you have two choices, accept work on this basis or don't work. He is obviously in the same position, what is he supposed to do?
timComment
-
99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by tim123 View PostIn what I do, you have two choices, accept work on this basis or don't work. He is obviously in the same position, what is he supposed to do?Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post99% of contractors are fu cked with this ruling!
Oh and insurance wont save you either. They may take your premium but will find a way out of paying if you lose. You only have to look at car insurance to realise that!
Also, just for the doomsayers out there, the appeal failed becasue the original decision was entirely consistent with case law. What it wasn't, but what can't be appealed, was a correct interpretation of the reality on the ground. This loss is a disappointment in many ways, but it is by no means an end point.Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt's not finished yet. Next step really depends on Jon wanting to carry on fighting, but if he does there are a variety of next steps.
Also, just for the doomsayers out there, the appeal failed becasue the original decision was entirely consistent with case law. What it wasn't, but what can't be appealed, was a correct interpretation of the reality on the ground. This loss is a disappointment in many ways, but it is by no means an end point.
I disagree about the decision being 'entirely' consistent with case law. Case law has actually built up a number of sound defences for IR35. And that's before one even considers the inconsistency between SC decision.
After having slagged off the MP boys, sounds to me like your running scared because Hector is now gunning for you too.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid! You're next, pal.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Whats the track record of the insurance companies paying out if you lose then ?
Seems like some people think they will just find away of not paying up....
Trying to work out if its worth getting...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment