• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

He's (nearly) back, He's (nearly) back, He's (not) on the right track

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    "Glitter, 64, was free to travel because the Home Office issued him with a new passport in November while he was in a Vietnamese jail for abusing two girls aged 11 and 12."

    It beggars belief! I hope the Home Office minister is going to resign over this monumental cock-up!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
      I prefer to believe the facts rather than an old friend of his who used to ply the kids with whiskey before they met JK.

      I guess we'll have to agree to differ.
      I agree to no such thing!

      Comment


        #23
        Update to the following Link: Glitter has been refused entry to Hong Kong. He Travelled to Hong Kong after refusing to board a plane for the UK.
        Hong Kong Authorities have sent him back to Thailand where Thai Authorities say he will be physically forced to board a plane to the UK if Necessary.

        http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20...g-6323e80.html

        Apparently Glitter does not want to return to the UK because his passport will be seized and he will have to endure lifestyle restrictions.
        Last edited by Diver; 21 August 2008, 00:12. Reason: Update
        Confusion is a natural state of being

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Diver View Post
          Update to the following Link: Glitter has been refused entry to Hong Kong. He Travelled to Hong Kong after refusing to board a plane for the UK.
          Hong Kong Authorities have sent him back to Thailand where Thai Authorities say he will be physically forced to board a plane to the UK if Necessary.

          http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20...g-6323e80.html

          Apparently Glitter does not want to return to the UK because his passport will be seized and he will have to endure lifestyle restrictions.
          well-deserved abuse.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
            According to Jonathan King himself he's not a paedophile, because according to some obscure definition that would involve having sex with a child under 14, and he says he never did. Which implies that he had sex with children between 14 and 16. That's sufficient to be grouped in with people like Gary Glitter IMHO. Sorry if you don't agree.
            Apology accepted. I don't quite agree.

            My view is that at 16 years - 1 day, it's statutory rape . As the girl get's younger, it shades into child abuse, and as they get younger still it becomes paedophilia.

            Given that I find the idea of 30+ year old men going around with girls much under 20, generally pretty pervy, I consider statutory rape, child abuse and paedophilia vile and abusive crimes. But I wouldn't say that a man who has sex with a 15 year old, necessarily is a paedo. Though he should still have his knackers removed, possibly with a couple of bricks.

            ( Would an 18 year old having sex with a 15 year old be consider paedophilia? I frankly doubt it.)
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
              Apology accepted. I don't quite agree.

              My view is that at 16 years - 1 day, it's statutory rape . As the girl get's younger, it shades into child abuse, and as they get younger still it becomes paedophilia.

              Given that I find the idea of 30+ year old men going around with girls much under 20, generally pretty pervy, I consider statutory rape, child abuse and paedophilia vile and abusive crimes. But I wouldn't say that a man who has sex with a 15 year old, necessarily is a paedo. Though he should still have his knackers removed, possibly with a couple of bricks.

              ( Would an 18 year old having sex with a 15 year old be consider paedophilia? I frankly doubt it.)
              And the less said about Spain, the better!

              Comment


                #27
                Where's Glitter today? I've lost track of this farcical jaunt around Asia - is he back in Thailand now?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by moorfield View Post
                  Where's Glitter today? I've lost track of this farcical jaunt around Asia - is he back in Thailand now?
                  I don't think he's got there yet. It'll be a very short stopover when he does
                  Confusion is a natural state of being

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Going to be put on a plane to the London now. Round up the lynch mob!

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by basshead View Post
                      Going to be put on a plane to the London now. Round up the lynch mob!
                      Yup.

                      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7573812.stm

                      Thai authorities said he would fly to London later. They said he had been told no other country would take him.
                      Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X