To those who don't believe AGW is real

[tay]

Is it hotter on average now than it was in 1998?

Yes or No answers please.

[sasguru]

Is it hotter on average now than it was in 1998?

Yes or No answers please.

Irrelevant as the last posts explain. If you don't understand don't post.

[EternalOptimist]

Is it hotter on average now than it was in 1998?

Yes or No answers please.

why ?

sasguru

[TimberWolf]

The meek shall inherit the Earth. [/B]

Off-topic, but isn't a literal translation of this 'the meek shall inherit dirt'?

[Mailman]

Is it hotter on average now than it was in 1998?

Yes or No answers please.

Tay,

You are an oil executive!

I claim my $5!

Mailman

[DimPrawn]

Is it hotter on average now than it was in 1998?

Yes or No answers please.

No, it is about the same. And the latest prediction is no change until at least 2020.

But CO2 output has been rising all along? So why are we being taxed on CO2 output when it doesn't change the climate?

Anyone?

[sasguru]

No, it is about the same. And the latest prediction is no change until at least 2020.

But CO2 output has been rising all along? So why are we being taxed on CO2 output when it doesn't change the climate?

Anyone?

Why don't you read the link you posted for your answer?



Gotta go to a meeting now. You village idiots gibber amongst yourselves.
I'll be back later to wipe the graffiti off.

[DimPrawn]

Why don't you read the link you posted for your answer?



Gotta go to a meeting now. You village idiots gibber amongst yourselves.
I'll be back later to wipe the graffiti off.

Run along. You've only got till 2020 and then after that the world will have melted.

[shaunbhoy]

http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630

I don't think the Royal Society may be considered a hot bed of pinko liberals, do you?

And also consider why you are taken in by the well organised propaganda of vested interests. Could it be because you is thick?

The first paragraph says more than enough. If they were simply stating facts from an impartial position then they would not set the scene by poo-pooing alternative stances. They are like all the "experts". Stating the facts that they think will best ensure continued funding.

Next!!

[DimPrawn]

It's the Gravy Train... <toot toot>

Just like the imminent ice age was, back in the dear dead days of the 1970s.

Yes, but the government couldn't make any money out of that one, so those scientists were doomed to starve.