Originally posted by threaded
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
assassinated by Scotland yard
Collapse
X
-
-
No, I meant accident.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.Comment
-
What made me/makes me suspicious was not so much the mistaken identity, but the reasoning & fashion in which this kid was killed.
It smacked of over excited, badly trained police officers who panicked. Not the highly trained material we are constantly being told of.
The suspect had been physically restrained and bore no threat to anyone's life. But still the Police shot him 7 times in the head at point blank range. Not because he posed a threat to life - but because it had been pre-ordered And that makes it an unmistakable execution.
Worse still. They deliberately mis-informed the public about the suspect in the belief that the station CCTV was not working
Mind you ... the IPCC enquiry hasn't concluded yet.
Originally posted by AtWIf he is not connected to terrorists then he is too fecking stupid to live, he is bound to make Darwin's awards of this year.Originally posted by AtWI could tell them [Menezes family] this in straight face -- what he did (if he is not related to terrorist attacks) is completely stupid and he deserved to get shot.Comment
-
Originally posted by BobTheCrateYes .. very good. Something to be proud of there.
Clearly this incident teaches not to jump to conclusions until after investigation concludes.Comment
-
Comment
-
My grief with you original assumptions AtW was your acceptance that terrorist events should allow the Police to act with complete impugnity.
The fashion in which this kid was killed (described at the time) indicated a cold blooded execution; not a shoot to protect policy by well informed command and highly trained frontline officers.
I am not condemning Scotland Yard or our Police. I've said before and I'll say again they are 2nd to none in the world and most of the time have to act with one arm tied behind their back.
But that does not mean they can be trusted to act with complete impugnity whatever the circumstances and it is an unwise public that allows their police force (or Gov't) to do so. What ever the reasoning it is a recipe for much worse things to follow.Comment
-
Originally posted by BobTheCrateMy grief with you original assumptions AtW was your acceptance that terrorist events should allow the Police to act with complete impugnity.
Having said that I formed an opinion in advance of that investigation based on information available in public press. If the information was incorrect, as it appears now, then clearly my opinion has to change because it is NOT based on premise of allowing police to shoot anyone, but on actual circumstances of the shooting as reported at the time.Comment
-
"I've said before and I'll say again they are 2nd to none in the world"
Where did you read that?Comment
-
But what essentially is wrong with shooting the odd suspect?Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.Comment
-
What is of more concern is that the damage is done - the British people were immediatly 'softened' up to a) condoning a summary execution b) believing that everyones life was in imminent danger. This was done through either poor journalism or deliberate mis-information (the story about the guy wearing a padded jacket etc etc).
Once we pick apart the story and hear the truth, and should it prove that the killing was completely wrong, I would wager that not everyone will return their feelings to the post-shooting state - many will not even know the truth nor care for what it means. Others will hear the truth but will remain just that little more willing to accept these things.
I believe it is called the 'thin end of the wedge' and is something we must not tolerate at ALL. History is littered with such 'thin ends'.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment