Blair isn't remotely interested in tackling the root of terrorism in this country, as that's far too much of a politically hot potato. Instead he prefers to undermine centuries of libertarian tradition and turn us into a quasi police state.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
assassinated by Scotland yard
Collapse
X
-
-
Matt: So are you saying you think it is wrong? Why?Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
We'll have to wait and see the outcome of the inquiry first.
Then we should all learn from any lessons that may teach us.Comment
-
Originally posted by BobTheCrateMy grief with you original assumptions AtW was your acceptance that terrorist events should allow the Police to act with complete impugnity.Yes I know you never said that - but that was the premise upon which your opinions were based.Originally posted by AtWI never said that
You did a tad worse than that. You accepted in totality the explanation given by the Police despite aspects (known at the time) that should have given rise to reserving judgment. Instead you arbitrarily (and viciously) condemned Menezes in the same way the Police did.Originally posted by AtWHaving said that I formed an opinion in advance of that investigation based on information available in public press.Comment
-
No it was not -- my opinion was based on publicly available information about Menezes's actions. This information now appears incorrect which is why I change my opinion. Had I formed my opinion based on premise that the police can shoot anybody then new information would not have made a difference.Originally posted by BobTheCrateYes I know you never said that - but that was the premise upon which your opinions were based.
Based on information available at the time. Of course I could say to wait for a few months until investigation is over, but that would not be discussion of the current event.Originally posted by BobTheCrateYou accepted in totality the explanation given by the Police despite aspects (even at the time) that should have given rise to reserving judgment. Instead you arbitrarily (and viciously) condemned Menezes in the same way the Police did.
I prefer to form opinion based on what's available at the time, with unwritten and unspoken obvious caveat that if this information is false then my opinion changes accordingly.Comment
-
"Accident" is one thingOriginally posted by threadedWhich is worse: the occasional person being killed by accident or larger numbers of people being killed deliberately?
Incompetence is another
This whole case has strong smell of incompetence, bad training and poor decision making from the get go and has only got worse as it went along.
What does remain to be seen yet though is who, what, why and where is primarly responsible in the end, was it the survelliance team? The shooters? Or those in charge? And that we will not know till we know the details of the communications between the various parties. Mainly what were the armed officers told? And what did the survelliance team tell those in charge? And how did the first survelliance officers (the one who was taking a leak) comment of "someone should a closer look as i missed him" result in a death?
And also some serious questions need to asked about what happened after the shooting, why the delay to the independant investigation? And where are the missing cctv tapes? And why where platform cctv camera's "not working"? (this last one is highly suspicious to me coming after the two bombings, there would have been an effort to make sure every camara was working on the network, pretty big coincidence that those particular ones were not)
And never lose sight of the basic fact, whatever went on it resulted in the death of an innocent man at the hands of very police who should have been protecting him, if they can cock things up this badly then there definitely should not be a shoot to kill policy, hell i would question should these officers be allowed out with guns at all, till their training and organisation can be adjusted so such monumental cockup's cannot occure.
We would not stand for incompetence with our doctors and we should not stand for it with armed police who can be litterly accuser, judge, jury and executioners on the streetsComment
-
Well, like I said, accident in terms of cars crashing. Is that not also an example of incompetence...
Do we really need to know all this information? Giving out such information publically will also enable the terrorists to commit their crimes.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Lesson Learned from the Enquiry
Unfortunately, in the current climate the way we are going we will end up with local community support officers looking like this...we should not stand for it with armed police who can be litterly accuser, judge, jury and executioners on the streets

Still, that might please WageSlave.Comment
-
I like the idea of that.
Cheaper than running the legal system with all its attendant hangers on: lawyers, barristers etc. etc.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Now you're repeating the Police Commissioner's carefully chosen but not necessarily genuine words.Originally posted by AtWBased on information available at the time.
As I already said - you did a tad worse than that.Originally posted by AtWI prefer to form opinion based on what's available at the time...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Today 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20

Comment