• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Todays political post

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Incidentally, the Tories have said they will make tax cuts at some stage in the next administration
    ... and more recently, Cameron has stated that he won't rule out tax rises.

    It would almost be worth having the Tories back just to see all you dimwits screeching when you realise that they're screwing you front, back and sideways, and that was all they ever intended to do

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
      ... and more recently, Cameron has stated that he won't rule out tax rises.

      It would almost be worth having the Tories back just to see all you dimwits screeching when you realise that they're screwing you front, back and sideways, and that was all they ever intended to do


      Definitely worth getting the Tories back if only to get excessive borrowing and waste reduced because we will all be better off. Labour still need to raise taxes after 11 years of never-ending tax rises. That is total incompetence.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
        ... and more recently, Cameron has stated that he won't rule out tax rises.
        Cameron will probably have no choice other than to raise taxes in the unlikely eventuality of forming a government. The mess the finances are in allow for little else. The alternative is to borrow more which has its own set of problems such as driving up interest rates, weakening the currency and staving money from commercial borrowers.

        He has also said that they will continue with Labour’s spending plans for the first two years. Labour said that when they took power. This is a bit misleading as, again, they have no choice. Deals have been signed and the penalty payments for cancelling would be as great as going ahead or the prices for further contracts would rise because supplying government would be made more risky.

        These are part of the reason why the early Thatcher years also had increased taxation (and borrowing): they were shafted by inheriting a basket case of an economy created by Labour. Earlier difficulties that faced both parties were the result of the Second World War, but latter problems were more down to incompetence of the lefties.
        How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

        Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
        Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

        "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
          ......

          These are part of the reason why the early Thatcher years also had increased taxation (and borrowing): they were shafted by inheriting a basket case of an economy created by Labour. Earlier difficulties that faced both parties were the result of the Second World War, but latter problems were more down to incompetence of the lefties.
          And for what reason did Major/Lamont/Clarke put up taxes then? The Thatcher government's incompetence?

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
            And for what reason did Major/Lamont/Clarke put up taxes then? The Thatcher government's incompetence?


            Taxes normally have to rise at times of recession/low growth to maintain revenue levels. That is why the Tories did at times raise taxes. They did actually lower taxes and put funds in the kitty when times were good.

            New Lie have failed to lower taxes or control spending in 11 years, throughout a boom period while also borrowing at astronomical levels.... 24.4 Billion pound in the current quarter !! That is total incompetence and time for them to go before we turn into Zimbabwe MKII.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
              Taxes normally have to rise at times of recession/low growth to maintain revenue levels. That is why the Tories did at times raise taxes. They did actually lower taxes and put funds in the kitty when times were good.
              Aww, diddums

              FFS... somebody who thinks politicians are going to make life better for them... the naïveté is breathtaking.

              You carry on thinking that they give a tulip about you, if it makes you feel good

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Alf W View Post
                Check to see if it covers things like cancer, depression, osteo-arthritis, MS, cardio-vascular problems and any other long term debilitating conditions that may affect your ability to work. Actually, don't bother because I'll tell you now that it doesn't. It covers a bit of queue jumping when you need an instant fix (knee op, dentistry, that sort of thing).

                Plus, if you'd broken your ankle in the UK the NHS would have seen you same day (you might have had to wait in the queue for a few hours behind the children and women though).
                Because it's all there is in this country, then I would have to use the NHS for anything debilitating. That doesn't mean I think it's worth the money. I'm a strong believer in the American health system.

                And to compare my treatment in the states and what I would have got over here. I was involved in an RTA at 16.30. At 19.00 I was under and on the operating table. That was after being taken to the first A+E and having X-Rays and a CT scan and then onto the bigger hospital where the consultant orthopaedic surgeon and team were waiting for me. With the NHS, I think I would still have been sat on a gurney at A+E waiting for an X-Ray.

                The speed with which I was operated on and the skill of the surgeon who did the job has saved me from getting AVN (Avascular Necrosis) which means I will most probably make a full recovery. It's indicative of what I think of the NHS that I don't think I could be saying that if the accident happened here in the UK.
                "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                On them! On them! They fail!

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                  I'm a strong believer in the American health system.

                  .
                  It's great provided you have a job with a health plan and/or are well paid. But should you experience any of life's downsides: e.g. unemployment or chronic disease, you're fooked.
                  It's no surprise that reform of the health system was a big issue in the presidential nomination race.
                  Having said which the NHS is inefficient and needs reform. It's the only government centrally funded health service of the big countries.
                  The French (best health system in the world according to WHO) do it better with sensible private-public partnerships.
                  Last edited by sasguru; 23 July 2008, 09:18.
                  Hard Brexit now!
                  #prayfornodeal

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                    So British manufacturing is/was all rubbish and it was a great policy to shut it all down?
                    Thatcher didn't shut it down. She privatised it and because it was all arse it went to the wall or was bought out. Which shows we were subsidising a dead horse.

                    British manufacturing isn't dead:

                    First

                    Second

                    Third

                    Forth

                    Market factors are to blame for the decline in maufacturing, not Thatcher. Link
                    "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                    On them! On them! They fail!

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by zeitghost
                      Gosh.

                      That's up to date... the Ryton factory mentioned there was listed for closure within a couple of months...
                      I was using that as an example for market factors and how Eastern European and Asian industry could produce a similar item at lower cost.
                      "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                      On them! On them! They fail!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X