North vs South again ...

[Peoplesoft bloke]

Try diet, exercise and eating less lard butties.

Fewer

What a shame the "superior" South hasn't mastered English yet.

[expat]

Try diet, exercise and eating less lard butties.

He means those new less-lard healthy butties

[chris79]

People who divide territory into groups/sections/etc and draw comparisons come across as rather primitive and close to nature in my opinion. As usual the issue of North vs South is raised by a Southerner.. surprise surprise.

[sasguru]

He means those new less-lard healthy butties

Er Yes, yes. That is what I meant.

[Peoplesoft bloke]

He means those new less-lard healthy butties

Well he should have hyphenated it then.

[Diver]

And the figures..........?

Ooh! Quite surprised really

Linky

[sasguru]

People who divide territory into groups/sections/etc and draw comparisons come across as rather primitive and close to nature in my opinion. As usual the issue of North vs South is raised by a Southerner.. surprise surprise.

People who classify people according to whether they divide territory into groups/sections/etc and draw comparisons come across as having their heads stuck firmly up their ass, IMO

And they have no understanding of recursion too, probably

[sasguru]

Ooh! Quite surprised really

Linky

Conclusive proof that Scousers are lazy.

[TimberWolf]

People who divide territory into groups/sections/etc and draw comparisons come across as rather primitive and close to nature in my opinion.

Those of you that want to divide people into groups please stand on the left.

[Peoplesoft bloke]

Ooh! Quite surprised really

Linky

Er no - this only covers Incapacity Benefit and I note that at equal 5th and 23rd in the list of "hotspots" are two areas in London - so this would be the South getting a "massive subsidy" from where?, the South or the rest of us? There's no matching map of contributions so the claim about subsidies isn't in any way proven. That subsidies thing is just another one of those things Southerners keep telling themselves in the hope that it might be true, but without any real basis in fact.