I think you could look at it as NASA having a 2% success rate at creating large fireworks!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Probability problem for statisticians/mathematicians
Collapse
X
-
-
Don't blame Statistics, blame people's misunderstanding. Including your own to some extent.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostTosh - by that rational the 300th flight is almost 100% fail. What happens if it does not?
There lies, dam lies, and statistics....The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
After 299 successful missions the chance of failure on number 300 is still 2%. But the chance of 300 successful missions is 0.2%.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostTosh - by that rational the 300th flight is almost 100% fail. What happens if it does not?
There lies, dam lies, and statistics....
Stats is such a wonderful thing.Comment
-
Okay, say there are 10 missions and a 0.2 probability of a failure overall, i.e. 2 in 10 of the missions will fail. You are 'allowed' to choose which one of the 10 flights you go on before any set off
, but just after you choose, an omnipotent being with a beard rises out from the firmament and booms "Son of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, listen upeth, mission 10 willeth defo faileth. In lightesth of thiseth insideth knowledge do thou wisheth to changeth your mindeth about whicheth misssioneth thou choseth afteralleth?"
Do you sticketh with the one you originally chose, or pick another mission?
The above is a fictional scenario and any resemblance to actual places, persons or supernatural beings whether living or dead or in some state not yet recognisable is not entirely coincidental.Comment
-
I stand corrected...Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostAfter 299 successful missions the chance of failure on number 300 is still 2%. But the chance of 300 successful missions is 0.2%.
Stats is such a wonderful thing.
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Are you by any chance trying to drag the whole "two doors conceal goats, one conceals a car" scenario into the discussion?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostOkay, say there are 10 missions and a 0.2 probability of a failure overall, i.e. 2 in 10 of the missions will fail. You are 'allowed' to choose which one of the 10 flights you go on before any set off
, but just after you choose, an omnipotent being with a beard rises out from the firmament and booms "Son of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, listen upeth, mission 10 willeth defo faileth. In lightesth of thiseth insideth knowledge do thou wisheth to changeth your mindeth about whicheth misssioneth thou choseth afteralleth?"
Do you sticketh with the one you originally chose, or pick another mission?
I always wonder how they got the goats to keep quiet and stand still under the TV studio lights, but that's a different question. As is yours.Comment
-
These 2 are not at all the same thing. That is where your scenario differs from the goats and the doors.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostOkay, say there are 10 missions and a 0.2 probability of a failure overall, i.e. 2 in 10 of the missions will fail. You are 'allowed' to choose which one of the 10 flights you go on before any set off
, but just after you choose, an omnipotent being with a beard rises out from the firmament and booms "Son of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, listen upeth, mission 10 willeth defo faileth. In lightesth of thiseth insideth knowledge do thou wisheth to changeth your mindeth about whicheth misssioneth thou choseth afteralleth?"
Do you sticketh with the one you originally chose, or pick another mission?
The above is a fictional scenario and any resemblance to actual places, persons or supernatural beings whether living or dead or in some state not yet recognisable is not entirely coincidental.
If the number that will fail is fixed, then it makes sense to change your choice after 1 failure other than yours is announced; but if the probablility is an independednt probability on each action, it doesn't matter whether you change or not.
This confusion in the other direction is why most people find it hard to analyse the goats/doors problem.Comment
-
If I had picked mission 10 I would definetly switch. Probably.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostOkay, say there are 10 missions and a 0.2 probability of a failure overall, i.e. 2 in 10 of the missions will fail. You are 'allowed' to choose which one of the 10 flights you go on before any set off
, but just after you choose, an omnipotent being with a beard rises out from the firmament and booms "Son of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, listen upeth, mission 10 willeth defo faileth. In lightesth of thiseth insideth knowledge do thou wisheth to changeth your mindeth about whicheth misssioneth thou choseth afteralleth?"
Do you sticketh with the one you originally chose, or pick another mission?
The above is a fictional scenario and any resemblance to actual places, persons or supernatural beings whether living or dead or in some state not yet recognisable is not entirely coincidental.Comment
-
Isn't this more akin to a poisson distribution where the expected number of failures is 2?Originally posted by expat View PostThese 2 are not at all the same thing. That is where your scenario differs from the goats and the doors.
If the number that will fail is fixed, then it makes sense to change your choice after 1 failure other than yours is announced; but if the probablility is an independednt probability on each action, it doesn't matter whether you change or not.
This confusion in the other direction is why most people find it hard to analyse the goats/doors problem.
So the probability of k failures is power(2, k) * power(e, -2) / k! ??Comment
-
As a wise man once said:
A thousand probabilities does not make one factConfusion is a natural state of beingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment