Wimbledon

[Bagpuss]

You could not be more wrong.

What is interesting about it these days? The fact we have no English player capible of winning it, or the fact the bookies stop offering bets on Federer after round 1?

I'm willing to be converted

[sasguru]

What is interesting about it these days? The fact we have no English player capible of winning it, or the fact the bookies stop offering bets on Federer after round 1?

I'm willing to be converted

You clearly know nowt about tennis. Do you play?
Federer is the most complete tennis player ever bar none.

[oracleslave]

What is interesting about it these days? The fact we have no English player capible of winning it,

That makes you sound like a bandwagon fan, i.e. only interested if there is an Englishman that could win. Big rugby supporter during the last world cup no doubt

[Bagpuss]

You clearly know nowt about tennis. Do you play?
Federer is the most complete tennis player ever bar none.

Yes, great player, I just think the tournament has become predictable. One of two people will win it. It's only interesting when they play each other.

That makes you sound like a bandwagon fan, i.e. only interested if there is an Englishman that could win. Big rugby supporter during the last world cup no doubt

Not a fan of Bugery

[sasguru]

That makes you sound like a bandwagon fan, i.e. only interested if there is an Englishman that could win. Big rugby supporter during the last world cup no doubt

Oh and Manchester U "fan". Bet he supports Holland in the Euro

[TimberWolf]

Federer versus Borg versus Agassi versus McEnroe

Federer or Nedal versus old timers like Borg, Agassi, McEnroe. All in their prime.

Would the old timers stand any chance?

[Sausage Surprise]

I hated it when it used to interrupt the cricket....thank you Mr Murdoch

[oracleslave]

Federer or Nedal versus old timers like Borg, Agassi, McEnroe. All in their prime.

Would the old timers stand any chance?

No.

[DodgyAgent]

Was that meant for me, Xeno or Hairy Arse Bloke?

I don't want any confusion in this!

There's enough for all of you

[DodgyAgent]

Federer or Nedal versus old timers like Borg, Agassi, McEnroe. All in their prime.

Would the old timers stand any chance?

Of course they would. The difference nowadays is the power of the rackets and the physique of the players. greats like Laver, Rosewall, Emmerson, Borg, Mcenroe, Newcombe would have adapted to todays requirements. Rugby players on the other hand were just too short to compete with todays Orcs