• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How much...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    I agree (perhaps not as strongly as so very wrong), but more in the sense that it does seem counter-intuitive to use land not to produce food for people but fuel for cars instead.

    I know what a starving person in a 3rd world country would value more.
    Yeah, so do I.

    It starts with "The absence of a tribal, uneducated, corrupt and oppresive government!"

    Also, water is more important than food in the medium to long term.

    It's not productive for civilisation to keep bailing out 3rd world countries the way we are. Longer term structured planning needs to be conducted and those plans need to be put into place.

    As for use of bio-fuel, I'm all for it, it would certainly cut down on carbon emissions!

    Churchill - In "Yes I currently have 3 cars but there is a reason why God invented the V8 Engine!" mode!

    Comment

    Working...
    X