• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

society doomed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    People shouldn't be considering marriage unless they're sure. Reasons like "we realised we weren't right for each other after all" aren't reason enough. Someone cheating on you, that's fair enough I think, but generally people just don't seem to take it seriously.

    However yes the current rules do seem ludicrous, especially that Sir Paul is lucky under the current rules to pay ONLY 10s of £million!
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      People already stopped going into marriage. Making it safer for each side should at least encourage marriage more, and more importantly quickly resolve any issues that arise from divorce.

      Current legislation that requires 50/50 split regardless if money were earned before marriage, and also unfair access to kids should be at the very least overturned pretty quickly, I don't know how the heck they arrived to position where some gold digger like Heather can get 25 mln after 4 years of marriage while her own earnings before that were like £30k pa - and in this case Paul is lucky not to give her 100-150 mln, that's just plainly wrong.
      a very sensible suggestion - but would require family courts giving up their garvy train.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post

        Current legislation that requires 50/50 split regardless if money were earned before marriage, and also unfair access to kids should be at the very least overturned pretty quickly, I don't know how the heck they arrived to position where some gold digger like Heather can get 25 mln after 4 years of marriage while her own earnings before that were like £30k pa - and in this case Paul is lucky not to give her 100-150 mln, that's just plainly wrong.
        It's because of her "contribution" to the marriage.


        Very expensive hooker IMO.
        "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          a very sensible suggestion - but would require family courts giving up their garvy train.
          Do you think courts like dealing with this crap? Courts are not exactly writing laws - they have to follow whatever Parliament agreed on, if NL wanted to solve this problem they could have easily done that. They probably don't want to lose female votes though as fair split and prenups would not be exactly popular among them.

          Comment

          Working...
          X