Originally posted by Diver
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Unintentional Conceiving.
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostWow Jerry Springer material on this board.
I love the bitch slapping bitConfusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Originally posted by tay View Post2UK is the best contractor UK alter ego ever. I am a big fan.Comment
-
Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostI so hope he is a real person. Gives hope to people like me that we're not the biggest ***** on the planet.
I actually think 2UK is a ****wit."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post
His friendConfusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Originally posted by BrowneIssue View PostYou will end up paying for the baby. You do not have to live with or marry her.Originally posted by 2uk View PostThis is one tuliptie legislation. I am calling Csa to confirm.
So you think it's perfectly acceptable to not to suport your offspring just because you no longer live with the mother?
*cough*wnacker*cough*Still InvoicingComment
-
Originally posted by blacjac View PostSo you think it's perfectly acceptable to not to suport your offspring just because you no longer live with the mother?
*cough*wnacker*cough*Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.
Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard pointsComment
-
As far as I'm concerned, if the bloke takes what is considered adequate precautions (I.e. Condom) and she fails to take similar precautions (Pill, cap,coil,implant or morning after pill) why should the bloke have to pay for her stupidity.
She has far more options to prevent pregnancy than he does.
Let her pay for her mistakes.
If she catches a disease, and a doctor gives her antibiotics to cure her, and she refuses to take the antibiotics and ends up blind and crippled because of the disease, can she sue the doctor for failing to ram the pills down her neck forcibly? I don't think so!Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Today 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment