Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If there is a Legal Obgligation and you choose not to comply then there are legal penalites.
If there is a Moral Obligation and you choose not comply then - well then what ?
Apart from Legal Penalties - hence Legal Obligation - surely it is a question of legal rather than moral obligations - eg if it were moral then one would have a choice not to pay the portion of taxes that may fund an immoral War.
What he said. Why is it that people are so prepared to minimise their tax liability as much as possible?
It's not us that's the problem - we should want to pay more tax to the government, but we don't - why not?
We fully deserve our tax breaks - like we fully deserve our bench time, unpaid sick/holiday leave and business expenses. It's risk vs. reward - I'm sure we could all be permie civil servants if we chose to be but we don't
"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk
The only morality issue that has any creedence in relation to tax revolves around what the state actually does with it. For too long we have been conned into believing that we somehow have some sort of moral duty to pay tax. What nonsense this is. We are spoofed into believing that tax goes to help the less fortunate than many of us whereas it actually goes first and foremost to enhacing the power and riches of those who dispose of it (jobs for labour voters). The tax is used to run istitutions that are run last and least for the benefit of those who need it.
We have a moral obligation to make it as hard as possible for govt to take money from us until these people learn to use the money for the benefit of those who need it above all else.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone
Except of course in the USSR itself where there was no possibiilty of strikes in that former worker's paradise.
Karashow Comrade ?
Quiet. There were (and still are) Trade Unions, however they were puppet organisations that never were striking because everything was for the workers anyway, supposedly so. It was the kind of Trade Union you were getting in Nazi Germany - just like youth organisations were effectively modelled on Hitler Youth.
You still can't pretty much strike right now in Russia - only if you work for a foreign employer like Ford (who are good employer anyway).
'Is there a Moral Case for the State to enforce Income Taxation upon the individual without his consent ?'
Indeed - but why stop there? After all, theft is just the ultimate extension of free enterprise. What right does the state have to tell me I can't steal things?
The only morality issue that has any creedence in relation to tax revolves around what the state actually does with it. For too long we have been conned into believing that we somehow have some sort of moral duty to pay tax. What nonsense this is. We are spoofed into believing that tax goes to help the less fortunate than many of us whereas it actually goes first and foremost to enhacing the power and riches of those who dispose of it (jobs for labour voters). The tax is used to run istitutions that are run last and least for the benefit of those who need it.
We have a moral obligation to make it as hard as possible for govt to take money from us until these people learn to use the money for the benefit of those who need it above all else.
maybe I should have entitled this thread "Does one have a moral duty to Pay agents"?
Comment