• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why you need to pay more tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Ten years on, spending has risen to £1.6bn, with more than three babies in four delivered to a mother not born overseas.

    Shocking. Why do we waste so much money on them?
    Wonderful use of statistics. How many of these "women born overseas" are actually British nationals?

    Comment


      #12
      So you thought that e.g. Polish men and women would come here and work but not have children here?

      Come to think of it, I don't think I'd want to have children in this country now.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
        Here we go again....

        Very few Polish are on benefits because they have a work ethic in thier country and they also have some pride. Unlike the waster lower classes in this country....
        No problem with the above - but is it right that recent arrivals (and thus little or no contributions to the costs) have instant access to free first world medical facilities?

        Labour underestimated the amount who would come here and either thought the current system could absorb the numbers or the demands would be negligible.... now the system is breaking down at the sheer volumes & you can either increase the supply (which will cost more) or restrict availability- which negates the whole concept of the NHS

        Also the Polish are not really the main NHS problem - coming from a reasonable level of Westernised heath care - defects will have been dealt with from birth (which is the cheapest way of fixing problems) but those arriving from the third world have untreated congenital abnormalities into adulthood which cause a disproportionate amount of costs trying to fix them, but will have access for free and available right from day 1

        Add to all of this those who arrive as health tourists & the question is at what point does this influx place a intolerable strain on the system thereby reducing care for others?
        And then the question becomes how much you are prepared to pay.
        How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Troll View Post
          No problem with the above - but is it right that recent arrivals (and thus little or no contributions to the costs) have instant access to free first world medical facilities?


          Been a while since you've needed a hospital stay on the NHS, has it?
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #15
            "instant access to free first world medical facilities?"

            Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post


            Been a while since you've needed a hospital stay on the NHS, has it?
            LOL!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post


              Been a while since you've needed a hospital stay on the NHS, has it?
              I never said it was perfect - only that it is first world rather than third...from my personal experiences, the system has worked & I cannot criticise it... although if we were having kids today it may be different due to the strains being put on the system

              WHO Healthcare rankings

              1 France
              2 Italy
              3 San Marino
              4 Andorra
              5 Malta
              6 Singapore
              7 Spain
              8 Oman
              9 Austria
              10 Japan
              11 Norway
              12 Portugal
              13 Monaco
              14 Greece
              15 Iceland
              16 Luxembourg
              17 Netherlands
              18 United Kingdom

              37 USA
              50 Poland
              How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

              Comment


                #17
                My wife is a midwife and 90%+ of all new bookings she does these days are to immigrants of one sort or another. I am making no judgment, simply stating a fact.

                Many of the new patients do not speak English so the clinic has to book an interpreter at £70/hour who has to be paid whether or not the patient turns up.

                She and her colleagues are under immense strain to cope with the huge rises in 'demand' on a service which does not have the resources to cope due to poor planning.

                Oh and one of these new patients stole a credit and debit card from my wife's handbag last week whilst she was doing a blood test and then went on a shopping spree in Tesco.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
                  Wonderful use of statistics. How many of these "women born overseas" are actually British nationals?
                  British nationals? What does that mean? Someone whose claimed asylum and got a British passport handed out after 3 years?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by dude69 View Post
                    British nationals? What does that mean? Someone whose claimed asylum and got a British passport handed out after 3 years?
                    It means women who are British but born abroad (e.g. family in armed forces and posted abroad) would be included in the foreign-born statistic.

                    Toff

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by dude69 View Post
                      British nationals? What does that mean? Someone whose claimed asylum and got a British passport handed out after 3 years?
                      Someone who supports England at cricket.

                      N. Tebbitt
                      Best Forum Advisor 2014
                      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X