Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Does one believe in the death penalty?
Collapse
X
-
The death penalty is not a revenue earner, infact it costs money. Now if they can sentence you to the gas chamber and you own a £1 million house with a small mortgage and a few tweaks of the inheritance tax laws (100% tax on death goes to HMG) then speeding could well become a capital punishment.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
Some people deserve to die, rapists, axe murderers etc
BUT guilt should be based solely on solid forensic evidence - not on any form of confession/statements - as people lie, Guildford 4 anybody?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Were they innocent...or could they not prove their guilt ?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostSome people deserve to die, rapists, axe murderers etc
BUT guilt should be based solely on solid forensic evidence - not on any form of confession/statements - as people lie, Guildford 4 anybody?How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Please define solid forensic evidence, or even give one example of such a thing.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostBUT guilt should be based solely on solid forensic evidence - not on any form of confession/statements - as people lie, Guildford 4 anybody?
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
1 in 6 billion DNA match.Originally posted by threaded View PostPlease define solid forensic evidence, or even give one example of such a thing.
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
The police beat confessions out of them, which was pretty much the only evidence against them. Something like 150 years between them IIRC.Originally posted by Troll View PostWere they innocent...or could they not prove their guilt ?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Yes, I believe in the death penalty. I believe it exists China and a number of other countries...
Murder with intent, for personal gain. If someone dies while in the process of committing another crime - also murder. ( i.e. two burglars caught on property, one get's shot by the owner, other crim stands trial for murder ).
Personal gain could have quite a wide definition. Including political/religious motives.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
My views are that if anyone murdered any member of my immediate family then I would make it my life’s work to kill them.
I accept that in a civilised society due process should be used to confirm that the suspect is beyond reasonable doubt the guilty party.
Once proven then the sentence should be death, and in a civilised society the States method of execution would be a far more humane and quicker method than what I would have in mindLast edited by Troll; 30 January 2008, 08:43.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Well trying to say only use when proved beyond any doubt, not reasonable doubt any doubt.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostThis takes us into a very grey area. Is this person more guilty than when there isn't high def video of them doing it? Why do they get a harsher penalty?Comment
-
I give a thumbs up to the death penalty for Murder,etc - But only on the condition that it must be possible to 100% guarantee that they were in fact the guilty party and the intent was there.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment