Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Speed Cameras / Speeding tickets
Collapse
X
-
How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think -
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post20mph would be better. Or put petrol to £5/litre.Comment
-
Originally posted by Troll View Postwhat do you think the figure would reduce to if a 25mph limit was inposed?Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostPetrol should be £10 per liter, but diesel at current levelComment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostBrown too
Where is that spelling thinbg?
1 sec...
there we go.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Ask to see piccies (Say you aren't sure who was driving and would like to see the piccies to jog your memory).
If it is the first offense you can prolly get it taken to court without worrying about it too much. Prove that you don't earn much and they will charge you £60 fine + £15 costs. The best thing about taking it to court is that the scamera partnership doesn't get any money. If everybody took it to court the scamera partnerships would go out of business in no time.
Also if you leave it until the last minute to send back the details and don't fill in the NIP, but write them a letter instead there is a chance it won't go to court anyway.
Have a look at http://www.pepipoo.com/ for lots of info about it, and the main thing to remember is that the DPA does not apply in court.
There is a good chance that prosecution in court will not have any evidence and in front of a magistrate they will say that DPA prevents them from letting you see the video of you speeding. Magistrates will buy this because they don't know tulip about the law, but that is in effect a get out of jail free clause because you can tell the magistrate with disdain that DPA does not apply in court as you are sure the prosecutor should now after XX years studying and practising law. Suggest that perjury is a very serious crime and does the prosecutor realise that lying to a magistrate in court could get him/her locked up.
Then ask the magistrate to dismiss the case due to lack of evidence, do all you can to refuse a new date stating that the prosecution has had x amount of time to prepare and only asked for a new date to be set when you blew thier case out of the water.
Can be a very satisfying experianceComment
-
Originally posted by Ardesco View PostAsk to see piccies (Say you aren't sure who was driving and would like to see the piccies to jog your memory).
If it is the first offense you can prolly get it taken to court without worrying about it too much. Prove that you don't earn much and they will charge you £60 fine + £15 costs. The best thing about taking it to court is that the scamera partnership doesn't get any money. If everybody took it to court the scamera partnerships would go out of business in no time.
Also if you leave it until the last minute to send back the details and don't fill in the NIP, but write them a letter instead there is a chance it won't go to court anyway.
Have a look at http://www.pepipoo.com/ for lots of info about it, and the main thing to remember is that the DPA does not apply in court.
There is a good chance that prosecution in court will not have any evidence and in front of a magistrate they will say that DPA prevents them from letting you see the video of you speeding. Magistrates will buy this because they don't know tulip about the law, but that is in effect a get out of jail free clause because you can tell the magistrate with disdain that DPA does not apply in court as you are sure the prosecutor should now after XX years studying and practising law. Suggest that perjury is a very serious crime and does the prosecutor realise that lying to a magistrate in court could get him/her locked up.
Then ask the magistrate to dismiss the case due to lack of evidence, do all you can to refuse a new date stating that the prosecution has had x amount of time to prepare and only asked for a new date to be set when you blew thier case out of the water.
Can be a very satisfying experiance
btw: I know someone who went to court, and did end up paying £1000 fine and 3 points instead of the £60Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment