Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Speed Cameras / Speeding tickets
Collapse
X
-
what do you think the figure would reduce to if a 25mph limit was inposed?How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think -
Petrol should be £10 per liter, but diesel at current levelOriginally posted by BrilloPad View Post20mph would be better. Or put petrol to £5/litre.
Comment
-
Good question. I don't know. What I know however is that 25 mph vs 30 mph won't make much difference to journey time in the cities, but it will certainly reduce casualties, if it's 100+ a year then I think it is worth it.Originally posted by Troll View Postwhat do you think the figure would reduce to if a 25mph limit was inposed?Comment
-
Milan would love that.Originally posted by AtW View PostPetrol should be £10 per liter, but diesel at current level
Comment
-
Comment
-
What is all this liter thing? Don't you mean litre?Originally posted by AtW View PostBrown too
Where is that spelling thinbg?
1 sec...

there we go.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Ask to see piccies (Say you aren't sure who was driving and would like to see the piccies to jog your memory).
If it is the first offense you can prolly get it taken to court without worrying about it too much. Prove that you don't earn much and they will charge you £60 fine + £15 costs. The best thing about taking it to court is that the scamera partnership doesn't get any money. If everybody took it to court the scamera partnerships would go out of business in no time.
Also if you leave it until the last minute to send back the details and don't fill in the NIP, but write them a letter instead there is a chance it won't go to court anyway.
Have a look at http://www.pepipoo.com/ for lots of info about it, and the main thing to remember is that the DPA does not apply in court.
There is a good chance that prosecution in court will not have any evidence and in front of a magistrate they will say that DPA prevents them from letting you see the video of you speeding. Magistrates will buy this because they don't know tulip about the law, but that is in effect a get out of jail free clause because you can tell the magistrate with disdain that DPA does not apply in court as you are sure the prosecutor should now after XX years studying and practising law. Suggest that perjury is a very serious crime and does the prosecutor realise that lying to a magistrate in court could get him/her locked up.
Then ask the magistrate to dismiss the case due to lack of evidence, do all you can to refuse a new date stating that the prosecution has had x amount of time to prepare and only asked for a new date to be set when you blew thier case out of the water.
Can be a very satisfying experiance
Comment
-
No thanks am not that crazy - don't have the time and can't be bothered, as someone else said I can opt for the speed course, so will do that.Originally posted by Ardesco View PostAsk to see piccies (Say you aren't sure who was driving and would like to see the piccies to jog your memory).
If it is the first offense you can prolly get it taken to court without worrying about it too much. Prove that you don't earn much and they will charge you £60 fine + £15 costs. The best thing about taking it to court is that the scamera partnership doesn't get any money. If everybody took it to court the scamera partnerships would go out of business in no time.
Also if you leave it until the last minute to send back the details and don't fill in the NIP, but write them a letter instead there is a chance it won't go to court anyway.
Have a look at http://www.pepipoo.com/ for lots of info about it, and the main thing to remember is that the DPA does not apply in court.
There is a good chance that prosecution in court will not have any evidence and in front of a magistrate they will say that DPA prevents them from letting you see the video of you speeding. Magistrates will buy this because they don't know tulip about the law, but that is in effect a get out of jail free clause because you can tell the magistrate with disdain that DPA does not apply in court as you are sure the prosecutor should now after XX years studying and practising law. Suggest that perjury is a very serious crime and does the prosecutor realise that lying to a magistrate in court could get him/her locked up.
Then ask the magistrate to dismiss the case due to lack of evidence, do all you can to refuse a new date stating that the prosecution has had x amount of time to prepare and only asked for a new date to be set when you blew thier case out of the water.
Can be a very satisfying experiance
btw: I know someone who went to court, and did end up paying £1000 fine and 3 points instead of the £60Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment