Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Yet more data goes missing...
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
You really believe that? Or are you playing at being an irritant?Originally posted by Churchill View PostTo many, he was. If you think collective rather than individual, then he was a great leader.
The Russians under the Romanovs were in a damn site pooier state than under Communism.
The people who think he was a great leader learned to think that way out of fear. Jews during the Spanish Inquisition had religious experiences where they saw Jesus. Not too much difference IMHO.
Under the Romanov's food production and life expectation for the poor increased, whereas under communism it fell dramatically.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Rubbish. Happy peasants do not a revolution make!Originally posted by threaded View PostYou really believe that? Or are you playing at being an irritant?
The people who think he was a great leader learned to think that way out of fear. Jews during the Spanish Inquisition had religious experiences where they saw Jesus. Not too much difference IMHO.
Under the Romanov's food production and life expectation for the poor increased, whereas under communism it fell dramatically.Comment
-
Oh dear. You think the peasants had any say in the Russian revolution? So sad. Can tell you went to one of those political indoctrination centres known as a Comprehensive school.Originally posted by Churchill View PostRubbish. Happy peasants do not a revolution make!
If anything it is a minor point that the peasants who left the land still believing they owned it, and those that farmed the land, believing they owned the land they farmed.
What really happened is the Russians were losing to the Germans in WW1. It was a war of attrition and the Russians couldn't afford it. There was a political upheaval in a couple of key cities and the communists grabbed the chance offered. That's all. If another group had been quicker off the mark, history would be quite different.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
If it had stopped there, then soviet Russia would probably have been a fascinating success.Originally posted by threaded View Post... What really happened is the Russians were losing to the Germans in WW1. It was a war of attrition and the Russians couldn't afford it. There was a political upheaval in a couple of key cities and the communists grabbed the chance offered.
But, just as in the French Revolution, it didn't stop there.
Stalin took control, got rid of the revolutionaries and what followed was Stalinism, not Communism.
BTW, the Romanovs were already changing when the revolution occurred. They had been made to see the light and were making serious improvements. They had to be gotten rid of symbolically and 'just in case'. As per Charles I's execution - just in case.
Communism and the soviet experiment might have worked, and would warrant re-trying, especially in Africa. But 'communism' is a bad word as it is an alternative to very rich capitalists getting richer so we're not allowed to try it.Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.
Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard pointsComment
-
What do you think todays proles would do without football?Originally posted by threaded View PostOh dear. You think the peasants had any say in the Russian revolution? So sad. Can tell you went to one of those political indoctrination centres known as a Comprehensive school.
If anything it is a minor point that the peasants who left the land still believing they owned it, and those that farmed the land, believing they owned the land they farmed.
What really happened is the Russians were losing to the Germans in WW1. It was a war of attrition and the Russians couldn't afford it. There was a political upheaval in a couple of key cities and the communists grabbed the chance offered. That's all. If another group had been quicker off the mark, history would be quite different.Comment
-
-
BrilloPad deleted a post in TPD this morning, so it looks like he got 50000 rather than me getting it.Originally posted by miffy View PostWhats going to go missing next?
HTH.Comment
-
That's a devious trick!Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostBrilloPad deleted a post in TPD this morning, so it looks like he got 50000 rather than me getting it.
HTH.
Certainly one to remember though...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment