Ferret: Churchill Retrial Thread

[Diver]

Winston will return

For goodness sake, a time out on the naughty step is not the end of the world.

Short sharp shock treatment, for the overly complacent.

Churchy is an intelligent man, and is probably reading this load of drivel and smirking to himself

[threaded]

Churchy is an intelligent man

Joke of the day!

[TheFaQQer]

I stand by my recommendation that the punishment dealt to Winston is too severe, and he should not have been given the same level of punishment as newbies who need a short sharp shock.

...drone...

Therefore, I am of the opinion that for older time served members, the punishments should be different to those for newbies, more gentle in the beginning and of course if that does not work the strength of the punishment should increase exponentially

Which part of

I warned the smelly old dog more than once.

and

As I said I did warn him a fair few times, more than I would have newer user too so I have already acted leniently.

did your tiny little "brain" not understand?

You are recommending what ferret has already done. Churchill was already on at least two points for doing the same thing, because we've discussed it in another thread. When I did something similar it was a straight ban and 10 points.

So your devoted plea for your beloved Churchill to be given some degree of leniency has already been granted.

A week away makes you consider your actions and posts - as I would think anyone who has been temporarily banned will tell you.

[milanbenes]

the 'lair generation strikes again

you see these newbies complain of bullying and then in their replies give personal first person comments about tiny brains

glass houses my friend glass houses

now you, have to decide, if you are going to give personal responses then you have to agree to accept what comes back to you

otherwise, use a different approach

what would you like it to be ?

make up your mind and decide

Milan.

[TheFaQQer]

drone

Milan.

I've never complained of bullying - I can hold my own, thanks.

However, you seem to have avoided the main point - you are asking for Churchill to be given leniency. He has already had leniency. You don't seem to be able to understand that ferret has explained said leniency. This implies that you are more than a little bit thick.

So, I'll say it again - which part of

I warned the smelly old dog more than once.

and

As I said I did warn him a fair few times, more than I would have newer user too so I have already acted leniently.

did your tiny little "brain" not understand?

[EqualOpportunities]

Which part of



and



did your tiny little "brain" not understand?

You are recommending what ferret has already done. Churchill was already on at least two points for doing the same thing, because we've discussed it in another thread. When I did something similar it was a straight ban and 10 points.

So your devoted plea for your beloved Churchill to be given some degree of leniency has already been granted.

A week away makes you consider your actions and posts - as I would think anyone who has been temporarily banned will tell you.

Are you running for chair monitor or something?

[milanbenes]

Crikey,

F, it was you, whom in this thread, was complaining of being rejected in general and also in Test Please Delete,

I suggest as an experiment you try altering your approach

you me be very pleased and surprised by the results

this advise is given free of charge

use it wisely

Milan.

[Diver]

I would like to point out, at this juncture, that I take none of this seriously, and trust that none of the other posters (old or new) do either.

I can not be made to feel insulted, recieve criticism, or condemnation by an anonymous poster.

Face to face is real, this is all just an illusion and has no more bearing on reality than a fever induced dream.

If it's getting to you, Log off and come back when you wake up.

I reiterate

[Troll]

I note that when certain newbies were banned, no one started a campaign to re-instate them - is this the source of all their anger against Churchill?

[Diver]

I note that when certain newbies were banned, no one started a campaign to re-instate them - is this the source of all their anger against Churchill?

Note:

I started one to reinstate el duder, and succeeded. but he blew it again.

Anyway, shut up Troll and stop stirring. This lot are bad enough without you egging them on