• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Offering Free Technical help to Charity

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    It seems to me that if the income raised is greater than the amount spent to raise it, this is a justified cost. Are you saying this is not the case?
    Ok, yes it is. The point I'm making is that with quite a few charities the upper echelon make a very comfortable living.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      Ok, yes it is. The point I'm making is that with quite a few charities the upper echelon make a very comfortable living.
      Don't see a problem with that if they are effective.
      What works, works.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        Don't see a problem with that if they are effective.
        What works, works.
        Like the government really. A few people propped up by the downtrodden masses in the belief that somehow they are doing something good and worthy.

        Comment


          #34
          OK - well this about gives me a conclusion

          The project stops here.

          Thanks to all who posted & voted altruistically & constructively.
          Thanks also to those who did'nt.
          Special thanks to Churchill

          The point of the thread was to see if such a thing could be done - maybe it still could - maybe i'm a Quitter.

          But my conclusion is - Someones always gonna Cusade against it !

          Shame really cos the (possibly 7 figure) sum that could have been saved was not just donation money - it was nett donation money after expenses !

          Think of the difference it could have made

          I finally cast my vote on the poll - Guess which one ?

          I've asked the moderator to pull the thread because I don't want it being used to launch attacks on the aforementioned Charity !

          Overall an interesting thread though

          Be Good

          GW

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by GWilliy View Post
            I've asked the moderator to pull the thread because I don't want it being used to launch attacks on the aforementioned Charity !
            Lock the thread if need be, don't delete it!
            Best Forum Advisor 2014
            Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
            Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by GWilliy View Post
              But my conclusion is - Someones always gonna Cusade against it !

              Shame really cos the (possibly 7 figure) sum that could have been saved was not just donation money - it was nett donation money after expenses !

              Think of the difference it could have made

              I finally cast my vote on the poll - Guess which one ?

              I've asked the moderator to pull the thread because I don't want it being used to launch attacks on the aforementioned Charity !
              Eh? There's 6 people who have offered their help plus the potential of another 12. Sure you have 9 "can't be arsed votes" but what else would you expect from an internet poll. There is only one person who has expressed a reason for not offering support and he has said why - he is entitled to that view and rather than having a go, if you have info that might disprove his doubts then share them.

              Why delete the poll? You asked for our opinions and they were given.

              Not really sure what you were expecting to get from this. All I can see is that you have a potential 18 resources offering help but have chosen to focus on the negative.

              Comment


                #37
                Pond - your quite right

                Pond - your quite right

                I was focussing on the Negative & lost sight of the fantastic indications of help.

                It's just that when someone posts a blatant lie which I went on to disprove, said person instead of admitting they're wrong then comes back with another accusation which I don't have the resources to disprove.

                I work at Oxfam & would like to continue to work at Oxfam - I stress this idea is completely unofficial.

                I'll message the moderator and ask him "Not to delete this Thread"

                GW
                Last edited by GWilliy; 29 November 2007, 10:34. Reason: changed offered to indicated

                Comment

                Working...
                X