• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Darling is to make an announcement at 3.30 - bit of a problem?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by snaw View Post
    Anyone else think that it's ever so slightly odd to be sending a data disk via snailmail?
    They only sent it that way because they couldn't work out how to attach it to an email.

    Comment


      Originally posted by realityhack View Post
      They only sent it that way because they couldn't work out how to attach it to an email.
      Nah, it was over the size limit for attachments and they didnt know how to use zip
      "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

      Comment


        Originally posted by realityhack View Post
        They only sent it that way because they couldn't work out how to attach it to an email.
        True. Walking around HMG offices as recently as 2005 you could still see all kinds of disc bric-a-brac sellotaped to CRT screens.

        Comment


          Originally posted by DaveB View Post
          Nah, it was over the size limit for attachments and they didnt know how to use zip
          That always made me laugh when I was working there.

          They'd set a low limit, thinking what good, secure boys they were being, without taking into account the size of files being sent as part of normal business.

          Comment


            Why data wasn't encrypted?

            Comment


              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Why data wasn't encrypted?
              Funny you've just posted that. I've just heard that this 'password protection' is bollox. There is no protection. Essentially comma separated values, CR for end of record.

              And it's an awful lot more than 15m, more like 27-35m, possibly everyone who gets child benefit paid to them, plus a good few who don't, but are for some obscure reason on that system as well.
              Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
              threadeds website, and here's my blog.

              Comment


                Originally posted by threaded View Post
                Funny you've just posted that. I've just heard that this 'password protection' is bollox. There is no protection. Essentially comma separated values, CR for end of record.

                And it's an awful lot more than 15m, more like 27-35m, possibly everyone who gets child benefit paid to them, plus a good few who don't, but are for some obscure reason on that system as well.
                Source?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by realityhack View Post
                  Source?
                  The source!

                  Comment


                    Maybe its a ruse and Darling took out the extra insurance on the package, for upto £24 billion compensation to fund his other **** up.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by realityhack View Post
                      Source?
                      I've more sauce: why don't they delete records when they are no longer required? Fancy keeping details of benefits paid to children that are getting on for over 40 years old now...
                      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X