Originally posted by Bagpuss
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
iPhone - 2 days
Collapse
X
-
Did I mention it is almost obscenely pretty, almost puppy-dog-look charming in fact? Beautiful gadget. -
Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View PostAhh, I see. That is in fact a sentient being called Arm... In fact forget it. Yes, yes that was me surfing in oil. Thanks for the tip.
Comment
-
It is very sexy.Originally posted by Zorba View PostDid I mention it is almost obscenely pretty, almost puppy-dog-look charming in fact? Beautiful gadget.Comment
-
So your entire argument is that because something is more popular than it's rivals, it is better than them in every way?
So a ford focus is better than an Audi A3? or a BMW 3 series? or a Porche 911?Comment
-
You mean Porsche right? Depends which 911 model you mean et al with the 3 series (2007 320d SE has great miles to the gallon btw), the old A3 is for hairdressers, the new one is great though.Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostSo your entire argument is that because something is more popular than it's rivals, it is better than them in every way?
So a ford focus is better than an Audi A3? or a BMW 3 series? or a Porche 911?
My point is clear, check the beginning of the thread.Comment
-
Taken from pages 1 and 2 of the thread:
Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostI will.
The IPod isn't superior to other MP3 players in terms of ease of use.
In my opinion it's not superior in any way at all.Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View Post35 million people disagree with you, sorry.Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View PostStatistically, the majority are generally correct, yes.Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View PostYou mean Porsche right? Depends which 911 model you mean et al with the 3 series (2007 320d SE has great miles to the gallon btw), the old A3 is for hairdressers, the new one is great though.
My point is clear, check the beginning of the thread.
Definately seems to me that your point was popular = better.
Have you changed your mind now?
Comment
-
Maybe it would be if browser and other things built on top supported the sort of things people might expect from that, or indeed from any half-decent Nokia or SE these days.Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View PostSurfing the web whenever you want using a full version of OS X is quite handy I would argue.
Still, looks nice and has certain usability merits to it...but just not enough to go on my Xmas shopping list.Comment
-
Sorry but you are all missing the point.
Apple's primary role is not to make trendy gadgets. It is to make money and at the moment Apple are convincing enough of us, the gullible public, via their look-good-designs to buy their products.
Some of us like them, some of us don't.
I suspect the iPhone will be so much better in 12 months time and by then we will know whether they were a success or not.Comment
-
Why get something overpriced, over engineered and tie myself into a long contract of 18 months when all I want to do is make a telephone call?Originally posted by Charles Foster Kane View Post2 days till the UK release of the iPhone.
I switched to O2 when my contract was up for renewal 8 months ago, to get the bundled Wii. And now the iPhone is out on O2 in a couple of days, exxcellent. That was a lucky choice as switching to the iPhone contract is free if you were an O2 customer before September's iPhone announcement (£219 otherwise). The iPhone will cost you £269, minus what you sell your iPod for on eBay if you have one.
So who else is going to get an iPhone? Cue heated debate for and against...Comment
-
lol, flagrant editorialising.Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostTaken from pages 1 and 2 of the thread:
Definately seems to me that your point was popular = better.
Have you changed your mind now?

You are Garry Bushell, I claim my £1.29Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment