Originally posted by SandyDown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Back to coding
Collapse
X
-
I can still do coding but doesn't take longer than 5-10% of the full time. But still you can learn, study, help developers on some issues, review the code, etc. And no I have never been a "powerpoint" architect. Architecture is about analysis, of course. I yet don't see the point of these barricades....I've seen much of the rest of the world. It is brutal and cruel and dark, Rome is the light. -
This is the main point - well made. Coders can do your job using 5% of the ability they use for their day to day activities. Why a 'management' position is seen as 'higher' or an evolution in my view is a relic from an industrial past. Those operating the machinery were seen as an extension to that machinery, with a per hour cost like that of the machine and an end product you can sell being produced. Those managing the machines and their operators were a step up the chain, because who wants to be the guy getting greasy and operating the knobs all day in the noisy workshop. You want to be wearing the suit and working in the nice office telling the others what to do. That used to be the hard bit. This is now on its head, with those operating the machinery needing much more skill and intellect than those organising who is doing what and when. Attitudes towards both groups of workers have yet to evolve. The 'operators' are aware this is an issue, the 'higher up' people are not.Originally posted by Francko View Postyou need to be very intelligent to succeed in a technical position and obviously in business too with the exception that in the first there is very little space for the middle ranges. Either you are good or you are bad. There is not much space for mediocrity. Business positions instead have a wide range of mediocre skills, simply because most tasks can be satisfactorily performed based on what everybody has learned at primary school, such as the ability of writing, talking, reading, etc. Sure you can spot a difference with the good ones but the mediocre can be good enough. In a technical activity you can't get away with what you have learned at school but it's all new learning and requires continuous training.
It's hard work and it's without any thanks or recognition. Enjoy the current topsy-turvy circumstances while they are still here, don't make a move into coding!Comment
-
As usual you look at the end product of a BA and think, huh I could do a word document and PP too, in 5% of the time, but they don't know what it took to get the work completed??
They don't know how much running, talking and meetings it took to extract the information get it reviewed by 20 people and changing it 50 times to keep everyone happy, before these work products are completed and handed to them on a silver plater stating every little darn thing the coders needs to do, and still they get it wrong, and constantly phone to ask questions
.
Can coders sit in stakeholders' meetings and convince programme directors to adopt a strategy/methodology? can they convince them why they need to spend a few millions on making a change? Can they gain sign off from various arsehole workstream leaders based in different parts of the world, can they chase numerous people and explain over and over the necessity of resolving issues and reviewing specs?
The answer is mostly no, and that's not because they are not intelligent enough to do it, but because they can't be bothered they are way up their own arses to do it, and the end of the day who gets the visibility, who gets to be well known with top CEOs and major stakeholders?? not the coder who is sitting in a dark corner in front of his black screen thinking to himself woooooohoo am so clever I can edit XML in vi !!!
Sheesh I never really meant for this thread to be another stupid pissing match ... but hey we all got to make a living and at this moment, I fecking don't care if a coder pretend coder think they are smart cuz they spend most day trying to decipher his/her predecessor’s code ... who iffing cares as long as I get to invoice I don't care!!Comment
-
Not in 5% of the time, using 5% of the intellectual capacity. And I don't care either, I do my time and invoice, Im not in it to win a geek contest. Im trying to point out why those developers you work with have a low opinion of you. Im also trying to help you by pointing out you have the sweetest deal - what you do is relatively easy no matter how impressive you try and make it sound, and your rates are probably higher than a coder. Enjoy it! You wouldn't want to be on the other side of the fence dealing with people like you!Comment
-
Most IT people have a high IQ and low EQ.
Most managers are the opposite.
I have both.
HTHHard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Not only could a Coder do it in 5% of the time, but it'd actually all work properly, too. Always a bonus. I've known ONE BA who knew his stuff - and he, sadly, had to go back to India. While he was with us, projects whizzed along and worked! Guess what? He was an accomplished coder, too. So there! Ha!Originally posted by SandyDown View PostAs usual you look at the end product of a BA and think, huh I could do a word document and PP too, in 5% of the time,Comment
-
... they can't be bothered they are way up their own arses to do it ...
Careful Sandy. Bit strong that. Not everyone is eloquent and quick witted enough to do what you say you can do. I'm certainly not. I have recognised this and have therefore chosen to remain a techie. I will happily fire-fight projects but I chose not to manage. I have every respect for those that can and, at the same time, maintain the respect of the technical staff.Comment
-
That was diplomatic!Originally posted by OrangeHopper View Post... they can't be bothered they are way up their own arses to do it ...
Careful Sandy. Bit strong that. Not everyone is eloquent and quick witted enough to do what you say you can do. I'm certainly not. I have recognised this and have therefore chosen to remain a techie. I will happily fire-fight projects but I chose not to manage. I have every respect for those that can and, at the same time, maintain the respect of the technical staff.Comment
-
Obviously shouldn't be a code monkey.Originally posted by DBA_bloke View PostThat was diplomatic!
Now, where is my arse?Comment
-
It won't be difficult to find, it resembling a baboons.Originally posted by OrangeHopper View PostObviously shouldn't be a code monkey.
Now, where is my arse?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Today 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Yesterday 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57


Comment