Originally posted by daviejones
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Britain faces Iraq rout
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
"If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"Comment
-
IMHO no, they weren't. Saddam was able to control the "insurgents", and we aren't.Originally posted by daviejones View PostNo. I think the principles behind the war i.e. removing Saddam were good.Comment
-
I agree...but the method he used was hardly ideal and the reason the opinion of the world was against him. The IRA were able to control crime in NI but the methods they used were hardly in keeping with the civilised world.Originally posted by wendigo100 View PostIMHO no, they weren't. Saddam was able to control the "insurgents", and we aren't."If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"Comment
-
Controlling insurgents for Saddam meant gassing villages full of women and children, torturing and killing anyone he didn't like and anyone who spoke out of turn.Originally posted by wendigo100 View PostIMHO no, they weren't. Saddam was able to control the "insurgents", and we aren't.
If the British and US forces used the same tactics, there would be no insurgency problem, but to be honest, I would rather that we withdrew than go down that road.
Let the blood be on their own hands not ours, we tried to help and they have proved unworthy of that help.
Let Iran have Iraq.
That is exactly what will happen anyway.Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
It's been said before but no harm in repeating it, you really are a tw@t.Originally posted by Diver View PostLet the blood be on their own hands not ours, we tried to help and they have proved unworthy of that help.
Wtf does the above statement mean?Comment
-
Just for your simple little mind I will explain.Originally posted by Clippy View PostIt's been said before but no harm in repeating it, you really are a tw@t.
Wtf does the above statement mean?
The general populace of Iraq know full well who these insurgents are, if they want peace, then they should denounce or hand over these insurgents to the military authorities.
but they do not because the insurgents that they know about are the ones that they are related to, or go to mosque with. In other words they are on their side.
if all sides denounced the combatants that they knew of then the bombings and assassinations would be reduced to a manageable level, and fewer civilians and members of the armed forces would die.
And peace in the region could be restored to a point where an occupying force would no longer be needed.
I am sorry if I used too many big words for a dribbling puerile idiot to understand, but I refuse to Dumb myself down to your level
Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
You sir, are a first class moron with a tenuous grasp of reality.Originally posted by Diver View PostJust for your simple little mind I will explain.
The general populace of Iraq know full well who these insurgents are, if they want peace, then they should denounce or hand over these insurgents to the military authorities.
but they do not because the insurgents that they know about are the ones that they are related to, or go to mosque with. In other words they are on their side.
if all sides denounced the combatants that they knew of then the bombings and assassinations would be reduced to a manageable level, and fewer civilians and members of the armed forces would die.
And peace in the region could be restored to a point where an occupying force would no longer be needed.
I am sorry if I used too many big words for a dribbling puerile idiot to understand, but I refuse to Dumb myself down to your level
Obviously, the rapid ascent from your last dive has resulted in your remaining braincells from giving up the ghost.
Your not related to mailman perchance?Comment
-
Finally a response.Originally posted by Clippy View PostYou sir, are a first class moron with a tenuous grasp of reality.
Obviously, the rapid ascent from your last dive has resulted in your remaining braincells from giving up the ghost.
Your not related to mailman perchance?
But alas, it seems that a philosophical or even slightly intellectual debate is far above the IQ level that mother nature has cruelly endowed you with.
I just added you to my buddy list in expectation of said debate, but alas ........Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Deep thinking there. Give up and they won't have to kill you. Somehow people don't seem to like just giving up to occupiers and don't seem to like handing in their family to them.Originally posted by Diver View Postif all sides denounced the combatants that they knew of then the bombings and assassinations would be reduced to a manageable level, and fewer civilians and members of the armed forces would die.
And peace in the region could be restored to a point where an occupying force would no longer be needed.
All that is necessary for evil members to succeed is that good members post nothing 
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36


Comment