• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

9/11 oops by BBC

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by 2uk
    I 'd be interested to hear that.
    No you wouldnt! You would just pick holes in the arguement and I am not armed with all the answers.

    It takes days to set the charges. It takes days to tie all the walls together so they fall inwards as the blast naturaly pushes them outwards.
    You say it was pre wired.
    Leaving explosives over a period of time is dangerous. You can not garauntee the efficacy of the explosion at a later date.
    The staff might have noticed to tie cables and bars.
    There is so much to say.
    I am not qualified to give the above advice!

    The original point and click interface by
    Smith and Wesson.

    Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
      No you wouldnt! You would just pick holes in the arguement and I am not armed with all the answers.

      It takes days to set the charges. It takes days to tie all the walls together so they fall inwards as the blast naturaly pushes them outwards.
      You say it was pre wired.
      Leaving explosives over a period of time is dangerous. You can not garauntee the efficacy of the explosion at a later date.
      The staff might have noticed to tie cables and bars.
      There is so much to say.
      TLG, sounds like you need to watch the film.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
        No you wouldnt! You would just pick holes in the arguement and I am not armed with all the answers.

        It takes days to set the charges. It takes days to tie all the walls together so they fall inwards as the blast naturaly pushes them outwards.
        You say it was pre wired.
        Leaving explosives over a period of time is dangerous. You can not garauntee the efficacy of the explosion at a later date.
        The staff might have noticed to tie cables and bars.
        There is so much to say.


        How about the fact that the towers werre evacuated the week before by the FBI , including security officers. ?

        How about the fact that bush’s brother was in charge of the whole cctv surveillance systems in the WTC ?

        Maybe your demolition friends can explain how a building ( namely WTC 7 ) collapses , without even being hit by a plane ?

        There are many more questions.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by 2uk
          How about the fact that the towers werre evacuated the week before by the FBI , including security officers. ?

          How about the fact that bush’s brother was in charge of the whole cctv surveillance systems in the WTC ?

          Maybe your demolition friends can explain how a building ( namely WTC 7 ) collapses , without even being hit by a plane ?

          There are many more questions.

          And you still maintain that you do NOT believe there was a conspiracy?????

          Comment


            #65
            it was a consipracy. End of!
            Keep it clean!!!

            Comment


              #66
              Have to say that I think that something dodgy happened, and that the Us Government at best stood aside and let it happen.

              The shame about it is that I'm guessing a lot of this is based on the Loose Change Film which is not great. It has the basic info in there but goes off on a tangent and gets a bit too silly in places. (Like one plane that was forced down actually landed and had all the passengers taken off so they could dissapear. Why bother taking all the people off the plane and making them dissapear when you could just crash the plane and kill them all.....)

              To me the pentagon part is the one that really does not add up. The hole looks too small, the grass in front og the building is perfect and there are no holes where the engines hit, and not grooves in the grass when the engines would have dug up the lawn. There is also lots of CCTV around the pentagon and it seems strange that none of these cameras got a picture of the plane coming in...

              I think there is a cover up, but what exactly they are covering up I am not sure...

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Ardesco
                Have to say that I think that something dodgy happened, and that the Us Government at best stood aside and let it happen.

                The shame about it is that I'm guessing a lot of this is based on the Loose Change Film which is not great. It has the basic info in there but goes off on a tangent and gets a bit too silly in places. (Like one plane that was forced down actually landed and had all the passengers taken off so they could dissapear. Why bother taking all the people off the plane and making them dissapear when you could just crash the plane and kill them all.....)

                To me the pentagon part is the one that really does not add up. The hole looks too small, the grass in front og the building is perfect and there are no holes where the engines hit, and not grooves in the grass when the engines would have dug up the lawn. There is also lots of CCTV around the pentagon and it seems strange that none of these cameras got a picture of the plane coming in...

                I think there is a cover up, but what exactly they are covering up I am not sure...

                One of my favourites is :

                Gov: We have been able to find the passport of one of the (alleged) terrorists in the wreckage. This proves the person was on the plane. So the paper passport survives but …

                None of the 2 Plane black-boxes ( which actually are red and designed to sustain fire and water ) have been found.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by 2uk
                  One of my favourites is :

                  Gov: We have been able to find the passport of one of the (alleged) terrorists in the wreckage. This proves the person was on the plane. So the paper passport survives but …

                  None of the 2 Plane black-boxes ( which actually are red and designed to sustain fire and water ) have been found.
                  Which of the (alleged) terrorists' passports was found?

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by 2uk
                    One of my favourites is :

                    Gov: We have been able to find the passport of one of the (alleged) terrorists in the wreckage. This proves the person was on the plane. So the paper passport survives but …

                    None of the 2 Plane black-boxes ( which actually are red and designed to sustain fire and water ) have been found.
                    I was under the impression that the black boxes had been found.

                    http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=6
                    Last edited by The Lone Gunman; 30 July 2007, 12:49.
                    I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                    The original point and click interface by
                    Smith and Wesson.

                    Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
                      I was under the impression that the black boxes had been found.

                      http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...42.html?page=6

                      The black boxes in the WTC towers .

                      BTW , take a look at the hole on that picture of the pentagon and ask yourself is that waht boeing would make ?? There are even no scratches where the wings should have hit.

                      Secondly take a look at the next picture with the plane part handing around.

                      Is that what you expect to see as wreckage ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X