• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Low attainers 'poor white boys'

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Rantor
    Ah, but reality is a fairly nebulous concept on here....when doe sthe alter-ego become the real character?

    Must take a lot of effort to keep all those plates spinning
    When in doubt, just remember that you're Spartacus
    Hard Brexit now!
    #prayfornodeal

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by anally retentive

      honestly, good education has much less to do with resources, and much more to do with parents' aspiration for their children.
      But if only clever, hard working people go on to produce clever hard working kids, and there is no state intervention, where will that leave us? With an ever growing underclass of low achieving, stupid, lazy people? Is such a "Liverpudlian-ization" of our working classes not something we should try and avoid?

      Perhaps we should neuter them and ship in more Indians. It would be cheaper than investing in decent universal education.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by pickle
        With an ever growing underclass of low achieving, stupid, lazy people?
        The tone of your post suggests that this is something that hasn't already happened.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by chicane
          The tone of your post suggests that this is something that hasn't already happened.

          Its happening right now. But its a relativley recent phenomenon, IMHO.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by pickle
            Perhaps we should neuter them and ship in more Indians. It would be cheaper than investing in decent universal education.
            Weren't the Swedish gov doing this up until recent times?

            Apols to any vikings if this is bollox.....

            Comment


              #16
              I'm Sally Anne like
              I remember the good old days of this site when people used to moan about serious contractor related issues like house prices and immigration. How times have changed!?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Numptycorner
                I'm Sally Anne like
                you mean you look like SA ?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by pickle
                  But if only clever, hard working people go on to produce clever hard working kids, and there is no state intervention, where will that leave us? With an ever growing underclass of low achieving, stupid, lazy people? Is such a "Liverpudlian-ization" of our working classes not something we should try and avoid?

                  Perhaps we should neuter them and ship in more Indians. It would be cheaper than investing in decent universal education.
                  some schools should be run along the lines of military training camps. i honestlt believe that the only thing to break the cycle as described above (which actually isn't too far from the truth) is for some of the little scrotes to endure a few years in a harsh regime, away from the futility of their daily lives. the one thing that real discipline instills after a time is a proper sense of self worth in an environment of respect for others.

                  at the same time, there's something else that is screwing up our youth. when i got my desmond in 1987 from a crappy collegel of higher education, i was still in the top 7% of my peer group. these days i'd be in the top 40-50%. unless i'm missing something and kids are roughly 7 times more intelligent than my mates and i, this means that degrees have been devalued massively in the past 20 years. therefore there's a whole swaythe of grads expecting good graduate jobs who just won't get them. it also means that employers are raising the entrance bar for positions that 20 years ago would never have been graduate jobs. either way, there's going to be a large number of kids at the top end of the system who are going to be just as disenfranchised as those at the bottom.

                  if more kids did plumbing & brick-laying instead of gdoing meaningless media studies degrees at bolton "university" then maybe we wouldn't be importing so many latvian tradesmen....!!
                  They seek him here, they seek him there. He must be playing hide & seek.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by anally retentive
                    if more kids did plumbing & brick-laying instead of gdoing meaningless media studies degrees at bolton "university" then maybe we wouldn't be importing so many latvian tradesmen....!!
                    Unfortunately I think they'd just end up being crap, lazy plumbers and brick layers.

                    The problem is with the work ethic (or lack thereof) amongst the 'working class' in modern British society.

                    At least the Latvians et al have some sort of ambition and drive and don't expect to be paid for doing sod all.

                    You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by anally retentive
                      when i got my desmond in 1987 from a crappy collegel of higher education, i was still in the top 7% of my peer group. these days i'd be in the top 40-50%. unless i'm missing something and kids are roughly 7 times more intelligent than my mates and i, this means that degrees have been devalued massively in the past 20 years.
                      No, it means that higher education has become massively more accessible in the past 20 years. Did you really think your 2:2 from a poly put you in the top 7% of the population? In terms of what? I think part of the middle class angst over the spread of higher education is that it does remove one of the main differentiators between the classes (having a degree), thus improving social mobility. Which is a good thing when your only way is up, but can be scary when your only way is down.

                      On almost any measure of a country’s success, higher education rates are always seen as a positive. There are direct correlations with lower unemployment rates, higher productivity, GDP, etc etc. The answer to places like “Bolton University” isn’t to shut them down and open up bricklaying colleges, it is to continually strive to improve the quality of teaching and range of disciplines on offer.

                      Onwards and upwards and all that.
                      Last edited by pickle; 22 June 2007, 11:23.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X