Could I get people to pop over to Technical - parse2.com and leave their comments regarding my new website.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
parse2.com
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
OrangeHopper,
it looks very technical !
one thing on the home page there is the following sentence:
'This makes aParse parsers ideally suited to the intepretation of protocol messages.
'
Interpretation !
All the best with it whatever it is.
Fun aside, is it not something which could be valuable to enterprise users of integration brokers like WebMethods ?
Milan.Comment
-
Thank you for your comments gents.
Fleetwood would be proud of you Milan. Fixed.
I'm not sure where I'm going with parse2 but it is a start. Nearly every system we work on involves conversions. We normally right bespoke software or use a commercial package to do those conversions. The conversion component of comercial packages is usually only a small part of the expensive whole. I'm hoping people who write software to handle large volumes of conversions may be interested in my produce because it is free and doesn't come with everything else that a commercial package includes.
For now I need to decided what to do next. I think I need to pick a messaging standard (say EDIFACT), produce the grammars and have more meaningful examples up and running on the website.
There is so much I can do with this and so little time available to do it in.Comment
-
-
You like ape arse?Originally posted by wendigo100This is all new to me, but I like the name - ape arse
So that's what you do on weekends?
Comment
-
-
Looks like a university compsci final year project to me. Nice and everything, but you could have watched TV or gone for a bit of a walk instead. Or perhaps had a cup of tea? I like tea.Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment