Originally posted by cojak
I'm doing exactly this...however, I think you could flip this on its head if you wanted to...
Rather than ask yourself 'can you afford to live off your salary'...how about as Director, you ask yourself 'what salary can I guarantee to be able to pay?'...
For me, a salary should be a regular amount that stays the same every month...but there is no way that I can guarantee to be able to pay myself any more over the next twelve months than I currently have sat in my business account right now (approx. £12k)...so in terms of salary, that is what I am prepared to guarantee someone, who just happens in this case to be me.
And more importantly, all of this is a bit of a nonsense anyway...whilst the IR35 criteria is grey at best, there are guidelines as to what self-employed 'v' employed means...and this arguement is not included.
Gordo doesn't mind people taking full advantage of the current structure, otherwise it wouldn't be as it is...he would simply say that there must be at least two employees for a Limited Company to operate in terms of Divi's...
IR35 is not designed to stop contractors...there is a huge economic benefit to contractors, it means large corporates can keep down their headcount which the City tends to encourage, investors are happy and stocks and shares go up...
What Gordo does want to stop, is people that are sitting at the same desk for years on end and taking the piss....
This is my very humble opinion anyway...
Comment