Would you ever vote BNP

[SizeZero]

I voted no. For the same reason I wouldnt vote Green Party; I'd rather put my trust in someone who doesnt get elected on the back of one 'issue' - be it the environment or national pride etc, but on a party who places equal emphasis on the whole package. A party that remembers that they are there to serve and not to rule would be an added bonus, but there arent any of those around.

In addition, I have yet to see a BNP candidate who can wear a suit and not looked like he's called 'the defendant'.

[PrinceNamor]

I have voted yes.

I have read their manifesto and a great deal of it makes sense to me. There is no sitting on the fence trying to please all parties.

I know they are overtly racist and that is something I realy do not condone, but I have measured them against other parties and found that I prefer their brand of overt racism to the other parties covert racism of positive discrimination.
I prefer their racism to all the voices I hear saying"the English are bad" in some way.

Over all they get my vote.

<duck and cover>

Drring a recent undercover operation a journalist found the following..

The evidence he collected includes one BNP member, Steve Barkham, confessing to a violent assault on an Asian man, and a prospective election candidate admitting to a campaign of pushing dog excrement through the front door of an Asian takeaway.

Another man is seen saying that he wants to kill Asians and attack mosques. Activists are filmed plotting to fire bomb a van being used by to distribute anti-BNP literature.

As much as I am disillusioned with the mainstream political parties I could not vote for these thugs. How can you condone this behaviour by voting for them?

[Kyajae]

Was it not the BNP leaders or reps been tried and convicted the other month in court, because of their comments at one of their rallies?

Indeed it was, and they were acquitted on all counts. Some say it was a victory for free speech, others suggested that the jury are fed up with all the politically correct cr@p spouted out. Eitrher way, it was a good result.

I'm no fan of the BNP but I do get p1ssed off with the main parties colluding with the 'british is bad' idea and denying our National identity. At least the BNP are starting to speak about what the liberal elite has decreed the 'unspeakble'. I think most white people accept minorities if they adjust to our culture, norms and laws. It's when certain ethnic groups want to 'be different', we're told not to do anything that 'offends' them. Doesn't seem to matter if what they do offends us.

[Addanc]

A little too much criminality hidden away in the BNP, I would not trust them in power. I'll be voting UKIP, yes I know some real t0ssers in that party as well. I think out of the current bunch of parties they are the ones with the good of the country at heart, as opposed to the rest who are in it to line their own pockets at tax payer expense.

NL motto: Government for the exploitation of the people!

[The Lone Gunman]

Drring a recent undercover operation a journalist found the following..

The evidence he collected includes one BNP member, Steve Barkham, confessing to a violent assault on an Asian man, and a prospective election candidate admitting to a campaign of pushing dog excrement through the front door of an Asian takeaway.

Another man is seen saying that he wants to kill Asians and attack mosques. Activists are filmed plotting to fire bomb a van being used by to distribute anti-BNP literature.

As much as I am disillusioned with the mainstream political parties I could not vote for these thugs. How can you condone this behaviour by voting for them?

I can show you similar examples from all political parties. Have you seen how the cash for honours thing is exploding? NL have been taking cash for access to their party leaders since day one apparently. (I am using that as an example, not for debate here).
Thugs attach themselves to all parties. The Labour sponsors known as the Unions were particularly nasty during the 70s and still are today.

The BNP has been striving to get rid of a number of these types. They have been open and honest about it.

[wendigo100]

Drring a recent undercover operation a journalist found the following..

The evidence he collected includes one BNP member, Steve Barkham, confessing to a violent assault on an Asian man, and a prospective election candidate admitting to a campaign of pushing dog excrement through the front door of an Asian takeaway.

Another man is seen saying that he wants to kill Asians and attack mosques. Activists are filmed plotting to fire bomb a van being used by to distribute anti-BNP literature.

As much as I am disillusioned with the mainstream political parties I could not vote for these thugs. How can you condone this behaviour by voting for them?

With that much evidence someone must have been charged. What happened?

[SallyAnne]

I have read their manifesto and a great deal of it makes sense to me.

Jesus!! Are you sure you read it LG?

"social experiment of multi-culturalism"

"multi-culturalism cannot work" - erm, isn't that what the UK is founded on?

"trial by one's peers; the presumption of innocence, habeas corpus – these are just a few of the most important rights we will lose forever unless we withdraw from the EU."

"We support the re-introduction of corporal punishment for petty criminals and vandals, and the restoration of capital punishment for paedophiles, terrorists and murderers as an option for judges in cases where their guilt is proven beyond dispute, as by DNA evidence or being caught red-handed. " Ah yes, that long forgotten scientific method of being caight "red handed".

It's like reading the Sun ffs!

"we will fight tooth and nail against the looming catastrophe of forced integration within secondary schools. This will involve the demolition of dozens – in due course probably hundreds – of perfectly good schools, and their replacement with brand new premises in which pupils from different ethnic minorities are mixed through bussing schemes" so they're going to let them dirty foreigners live in the country if they're already here, but woah betide them if they try to mix with us eh?

"We will restore all of the old exams that have been abolished, starting with the "A" and "O" Levels, and will reverse the dumbing down of those that have been dumbed down." - cause they were much better "back when I were a lad"...we didn't have none of this coursework malarki, and them kids with that new fangled dislexia knew better than to pipe up aswell!

"The traffic congestion that makes life so hard for millions, especially in south East England, is partly the result of over-crowding and immigration"...so once we get rid of all them fariegners, we can start capping the amount of kids you all have aswell. As long as we can drive into London, who gives a feck about anyone else.

"Our building plans for human-sized cities will also see a general ban on out-of town retail/leisure developments. They encourage car dependence and socially disadvantage pensioners, single mothers and non-car (poorer) families. Such projects need to make use of brownfield sites within towns, linked by public transport networks." I dont even know where to start with this one!

And finally....

"We are the only true 'Green Party' in Britain because only the BNP have the resolve to end mass immigration into Britain."

Marvellous!

Shame on you LG.

[wendigo100]

Well that's the end of that then.

[Ted Crilly]

All those who voted yes are in simple terms "too smart for their own good".

Re-read the manifesto with the view that it is written purely and simply from the "politics of fear" angle. Everything in their policy document is their way of attacking something which is threatening you". As SA above stated, it's a Sun reader policy. Perhaps you are all so clever you are now officially stupid again, perhaps you just weren't that smart in the first place.

[Rantor]

I can show you similar examples from all political parties. Have you seen how the cash for honours thing is exploding? NL have been taking cash for access to their party leaders since day one apparently. (I am using that as an example, not for debate here).
Thugs attach themselves to all parties. The Labour sponsors known as the Unions were particularly nasty during the 70s and still are today.

The BNP has been striving to get rid of a number of these types. They have been open and honest about it.

Leaving aside the issue of race for a second, the question I would ask is what sort of country would you be living under. A common facet of most modern extreme-right parties is their claim to be libertarian in nature - free the people form the burden of the socialist super states we are all cruelly enslaved by etc. etc.

However, the manifesto commitments of parties such as the BNP are going to require massive extension of state powers to implement effectively - how else is the state going to 'manage' the reassertion of what they (not you) consider to be the cultural, ethnic and national security norm?

Other countries get into trouble with this stuff and they have stronger constitutional frameworks than Britain. One side-effect of blairism has been to show how easy it is to nudge Britain towards an authoritarian state - I suspect Niki G and chums might accelerate that process a wee bit.