• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Budget Day

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    So the pension changes are targeting SalSac only. Bad news for regular employees (inc. umbrella employees), but no changes to employer contributions more generally.
    Yes, from 2029. This allows those who can to max out SalSac before that and then retire. After that, the limit applies to both employer and employee NI, so will be a further disincentive for Umbrella 'employment'.

    Other details include 2p extra on savings income from April 2027, that's 2% over one's marginal rate. There really is no incentive to save outwith ISAs (limit reduced to £12k for cash ISAS for the under 65s).

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
      "freezing fuel duty and raising tax on electric vehicles simultaneously"

      this is awesome and sends a clear message

      Milan.

      The cut on green levy should make it a net zero change for the EV.
      Make Mercia Great Again!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post


        a net zero change
        I see what you did there.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by openstrike View Post

          I see what you did there.

          I allowed myself a slight smirk as I wrote it

          I still can't work out if my £20k employer contributions are now subject to NI from myCo. It appears that both Employer and Employee NI are being charged; if that's the case, it could be an extra £2000 NI bill.


          Last edited by BlueSharp; Today, 14:20.
          Make Mercia Great Again!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

            Yes, from 2029. This allows those who can to max out SalSac before that and then retire. After that, the limit applies to both employer and employee NI, so will be a further disincentive for Umbrella 'employment'.

            Other details include 2p extra on savings income from April 2027, that's 2% over one's marginal rate. There really is no incentive to save outwith ISAs (limit reduced to £12k for cash ISAS for the under 65s).
            Thanks for pointing this out.

            Personally, maxing out my SalSac on the way to retirement is part of my plan.
            I've just wound down my company and was deeply unhappy about them grabbing more money that was headed for my pension.

            I've checked this, and sure enough does not kick in until 2029. I can live with that, personally.

            In a more general sense, I believe that and the restrictions on cash ISAs will actively discourage people from paying into their pensions. Self defeating, it won't raise as much tax as predicted and result in more pensioners relying on benefits. Seems mad.

            Comment


              #16
              He who Hingeth aboot, Getteth Hee Haw. https://forums.contractoruk.com/core...ies/smokin.gif

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post


                I allowed myself a slight smirk as I wrote it

                I still can't work out if my £20k employer contributions are now subject to NI from myCo. It appears that both Employer and Employee NI are being charged; if that's the case, it could be an extra £2000 NI bill.

                They are not. There are no changes to the taxation of employer contributions more generally - the budget speech was explicit about that. I believe I said this to you before, but SalSac is a very precise type of arrangement whereby salary is foregone for an increased pension contribution and that costs the Treasury a lot more than traditional employer contributions, which are not taken from foregone income. This is why it was targeted.

                There is a question about whether employers will be able to circumvent this, such as by changing contractual terms so that salary is not forgone (and employer contributions increased for a reduced contractual salary), but that isn't so easy as there are employment law and other considerations that would require broad agreement from the workforce (i.e., they cannot be decided per employee).

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

                  Is the "clear message" that owners of low-end Porsches for the mass affluent will be babied a little while longer?

                  certainly looks that way lol

                  we're in it together

                  Milan.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

                    There is a question about whether employers will be able to circumvent this, such as by changing contractual terms so that salary is not forgone (and employer contributions increased for a reduced contractual salary), but that isn't so easy as there are employment law and other considerations that would require broad agreement from the workforce (i.e., they cannot be decided per employee).
                    When this was first mentioned, I wondered what there is to stop a company having a range of employment contracts with different pension contributions and salary levels but not actually constituting SalSac.

                    Many companies where I've worked have had workers on 'personal contracts' at senior levels and a general contract for others. Maybe pension contribution rate will become a differentiating criteria for selecting an employer or umbrella company (later there would presumably be a Pension Charge variant of the Loan Charge!)

                    Of course, those with LtdCos can still pay whatever they want as pension contributions, so that the 'outside' contract becomes even more valuable.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Good that it is being delayed until 2029 at least, maybe it gets binned before then. Very weird thing to be implementing just as you are trying to get re-elected mind! Maybe it is a ruse to get the fiscal rules to add up now - in the hope that the sunlit uplands have started before 2029 and they can cancel it as part of an election campaign.
                      Last edited by Ketto; Today, 16:13.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X