Every time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tax rises?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.Originally posted by Protagoras View PostEvery time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.
I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.
But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.Comment
-
It won't go away. Any party, least of all this one, wants to be accused of increasing the level of income tax, which is what merging NICs into Income Tax would mean to the man in the street.Originally posted by willendure View Post
Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.
I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.
But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.
Plus you would double the tax burden on everyone over the retirement age....Blog? What blog...?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment