Every time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tax rises?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.Originally posted by Protagoras View PostEvery time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.
I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.
But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.Comment
-
It won't go away. Any party, least of all this one, wants to be accused of increasing the level of income tax, which is what merging NICs into Income Tax would mean to the man in the street.Originally posted by willendure View Post
Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.
I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.
But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.
Plus you would double the tax burden on everyone over the retirement age....Blog? What blog...?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment