Sally Anne, run a survey on who prefers women's tennis to men's tennis.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Overpaid women.
Collapse
X
-
-
It was far better when they used to wear knickers.Originally posted by cityboyI prefer watching the women. The tennis is secondaryComment
-
Nah, I cant be arsed.Originally posted by cityboySally Anne, run a survey on who prefers women's tennis to men's tennis.
And I dont like tennis anyway.
I dont even know what I'm doing in this thread to be honest
The pope is a tard.Comment
-
Just to clarify.Originally posted by SallyAnneDid you? I just thought you were babbling on about how women shouldn't be paid the same. And then babbled some more on how we're supposed to say dinner ladies are the same as bin men etc.
Did I mention babble?
No mate. What I am saying is we stop with this "women are equal" tulip and accept that there are differences in the sexes.
Celebrate those differences instead of chasing this ridiculous equality ideal. These women are asking to be treated as equals when clearly they are not.
Neither are dinner ladies doing an equal job to bin men, but to be PC we have to say they are.?Does the bold bit help? Babble.I will now propose a reason why women should be paid as much as the men at Wimbledon that you could have used instead of bleeting on about equality and tulip.
Money.
The womens games are as popular as the mens. They generate an equal amount of revenue for the tournament and should therefore be given an equal share. However I would guess that were it a men only comp people would still pay the same. There would still be a market for the womens game.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
If there is an after-life, I want to come back as kournikova's second serve tennis ball...Originally posted by Bright SparkI must admit the thought of kournikova in the 'buff' does sound appealing though.
http://www.kournikova.com/photos/slides/pic19.jpgComment
-
I think you are well aware of the inability of some on this board to grasp subtle distinctions LG.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanI think I just said that.
Boom boom boom boom
A-haw haw haw haw
Hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm
Hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmmComment
-
Do you ever have anything constructive to add to a discussion? Typical woman - proved wrong and resort to insults! Women are not equal to men in a number of areas and it is no good trying to pretend they are. Saying that, in some areas they excel. I don't know what this obsession is with equality - people are not, never have been and never will be equal.Originally posted by SallyAnneDid you? I just thought you were babbling on about how women shouldn't be paid the same. And then babbled some more on how we're supposed to say dinner ladies are the same as bin men etc.
Did I mention babble?Comment
-
Yes it did, thank youOriginally posted by The Lone GunmanJust to clarify.
Does the bold bit help? Babble.
My humble apologies
The pope is a tard.Comment
-
Ok I see some of your points but put it this way, despite being played on the same courts as the same time at the same venue there are essentially two different competitions going on, so why can’t the people who run the game just set the prize money at whatever level they like? ...More if they want! Take away the equality issue and the problem goes away.
I'm just saying why can't they have the same level of prize money if they want why does it always have to be less?Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I knew we would get there in the end.Originally posted by gingerjediOk I see some of your points but put it this way, despite being played on the same courts as the same time at the same venue there are essentially two different competitions going on, so why can’t the people who run the game just set the prize money at whatever level they like? ...More if they want! Take away the equality issue and the problem goes away. [TLG emphasis]
I'm just saying why can't they have the same level of prize money if they want why does it always have to be less?
It is the equality thing that pisses me off.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment