• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Potus has fallen

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    If they're not fit, they shouldn't be able to get their party's nomination and even if they do, they then have to win. This seems a bit like capitalism and market forces - if 200 million people decide he's able to do the job, why put in new restrictions? You want to give someone the responsibility of deciding for the American public which people they are allowed to vote for... sounds a nightmare to me. A numeric limit is easiest but then a bit pointless because say you make it 70, loads of people are still fit until 80 and others are severely unfit by 60.
    They set the precedent, minimum age of 35, natural born citizen etc.

    538 people decide the president, not 200 million.

    Comment

    Working...
    X