Surrey speeds

[vetran]

I understand what it means thanks, but I also understand that Vetty makes up stuff with no proof so I chose to ignore it.

So you think I should back down by quoting facts, and defending cyclists? Hmmm, I see. No, sorry. There is plenty of evidence out there that cyclists are disproportionately (see what I did there) injured due to bad car driving than are injured due to their own reckless cycling. If that wasn't the case the new highway code rules would not be implemented to protect cyclists more from idiot drivers.

Seems most of the anti-cycling brigade forget that us cyclists we drive too. We see what you see out on the roads. We also come across cyclists. But we see their cycling from a position of knowledge. Maybe more car drivers need to get off their fat ass, get out there on a bike and see how bad car driving really is when you're not protected by a 3 ton steel shell.

when are you going to start quoting facts?

[Whorty]

when are you going to start quoting facts?

Oh the irony!

[Zigenare]

when are you going to start quoting facts?

Leave him alone, he's loved up! Haven't you seen the picture?