Originally posted by threaded
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Shock News: Judge makes common sense rulling
Collapse
X
-
Well said. All I ever wanted from the family courts is what was in the 1989 Children Act. Never implemented. I dont think any of the other court divisons are any better. -
You couldn't be anything else with a name like that.Sir Igor Judge, president of the High Court's Queen's Bench Division
I wonder if he knows Mr Plodd?Comment
-
There is a judge laws in one divison. A m8 was in front of him once - he is a really bent evil ****.Originally posted by wendigo100You couldn't be anything else with a name like that.
I wonder if he knows Mr Plodd?Comment
-
If the sign says 20 on it, and you can read the 20 on it, then clearly unless you are too thick to realise that means 20mph speed limit (in which case you shouldn't be driving) and you exceed 20mph then you are speeding and should get fined. This is pure common sense and I applaud the judge in this case.
The amount of money to be collected is irrelevant. If these drivers had stayed within the limit then they wouldn't be being fined. It's as simple as that.Comment
-
So I am to respond to any road sign put up by any muppet in a manner I think is appropriate to that sign?Originally posted by Cowboy BobIf the sign says 20 on it, and you can read the 20 on it, then clearly unless you are too thick to realise that means 20mph speed limit (in which case you shouldn't be driving) and you exceed 20mph then you are speeding and should get fined. This is pure common sense and I applaud the judge in this case.
The amount of money to be collected is irrelevant. If these drivers had stayed within the limit then they wouldn't be being fined. It's as simple as that.
Or should I just respond to official ones?
If it is the later then the official signs must conform to a standard or else I will not recognise them.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
The Alex Ferguson driving on the hard shoulder technicality get out of tulip clause still bugs me, can't remember the details but it was a pathetic excuse that the magistrate accepted. Does anybody know how the celebrity lawyer who Fergie used has got on since he was arrested for dodginess regarding another technicality case !?Comment
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/6100970.stmOriginally posted by rootsnallDoes anybody know how the celebrity lawyer who Fergie used has got on since he was arrested for dodginess regarding another technicality case !?Coffee's for closersComment
-
Then you will pay the fine and I will have no sympathy. I've seen the signs on Tower Bridge and it's fairly obvious what they mean. Common sense is required on both sides and motorists trying to take the p!ss and then complaining about it because they think they know best are just idiots.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanSo I am to respond to any road sign put up by any muppet in a manner I think is appropriate to that sign?
Or should I just respond to official ones?
If it is the later then the official signs must conform to a standard or else I will not recognise them.Comment
-
So when does the sign become unrecognisable then?Originally posted by Cowboy BobThen you will pay the fine and I will have no sympathy. I've seen the signs on Tower Bridge and it's fairly obvious what they mean. Common sense is required on both sides and motorists trying to take the p!ss and then complaining about it because they think they know best are just idiots.
It is the council taking the piss. The law is quite clear. It doesn't say the signs have to kind of look like it stipulates exactly what they should look like.
This could open a free for all, or cause chaos with money grabbing councils sticking up not quite right signs and putting speed guns behind them.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Like I said, common sense is what's needed on both sides. If the sign is placed in good faith and anyone with an ounce of sense can understand it, then that should be good enough.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanSo when does the sign become unrecognisable then?
It is the council taking the piss. The law is quite clear. It doesn't say the signs have to kind of look like it stipulates exactly what they should look like.
This could open a free for all, or cause chaos with money grabbing councils sticking up not quite right signs and putting speed guns behind them.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment