It's happening again.

[Old Greg]

Is it when they’ve analyzed the machines and demonstrated that the votes were changed to favor one of the candidates, proved it in court and everything?

How were these votes changed?

[hugebrain]

How were these votes changed?

You set the machines so they have an abnormally high error rate then you can send the same stack of ballots through multiple times and the adjudicator can set them as votes to whomever they like. Before doing this you can cover up the windows so no observers can see what you’re doing or make up some story about a burst water pipe. Next time remember about the security cameras and don’t have any of your co-conspirators boast about their crimes.

You can also set the machines to automatically weigh one candidate’s vote higher than the other which is where the fractional votes come from

[AtW]

And why wasn't that proven in court?

[hugebrain]

And why wasn't that proven in court?

Already done. Here’s the preliminary report.

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2...edacted%5D.pdf

Don’t worry your communist friends have probably bribed and blackmailed enough people to turn a couple of Republicans traitor, so Biden might still squeak in. We’ll have to wait and see

[AtW]

Already done. Here’s the preliminary report.

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2...edacted%5D.pdf

Don’t worry your communist friends have probably bribed and blackmailed enough people to turn a couple of Republicans traitor, so Biden might still squeak in. We’ll have to wait and see

That's not a link to a court decision.

[NickFitz]

If it gets to this stage

I think I've spotted the flaw in your argument

[hugebrain]

That's not a link to a court decision.

You have to prove your case first and then the court makes it’s decision. That’s how it works.

If you waited until after the decision to prove your case it wouldn’t make any more sense than a crazy Russian communist.

[AtW]

You have to prove your case first and then the court makes it’s decision. That’s how it works.

So you agree that the case wasn't proven in court?

[Old Greg]

You have to prove your case first and then the court makes it’s decision. That’s how it works.

If you waited until after the decision to prove your case it wouldn’t make any more sense than a crazy Russian communist.

What you have posted are allegations, not proof.

Here is the response:

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/a...y_710474_7.pdf

Why do you believe one side is proof and the other side isn't?

[AtW]

Later today