Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bitches Ain't tulip
Collapse
X
-
-
Coming from a deranged alcoholic like you, I can live with your opinion.Originally posted by minestrone View PostPeople like you are dangerous. I mean the whole post is line after line of whackery.Comment
-
Do you have a degree greg?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostComing from a deranged alcoholic like you, I can live with your opinion.Comment
-
Yes, we've covered this, but I'm bored with your meandering alcohol-fuelled ramblings.Originally posted by minestrone View PostDo you have a degree greg?Comment
-
I mean the thread was really just about "this is an exceptionally bad taste song".
Then greg runs in with "I wouldn't ban it but I want to ban it" and goes on another thread to accuse me of being a wife beater.Comment
-
Who decides what is and isn't acceptable? This makes me think of the grid girls thing. People who were not grid girls getting offended on their behalf and getting them banned and ignoring the grid girls themselves saying that they actually liked being grid girls...Originally posted by Old Greg View PostAs a starting point, I don't think it should be banned (legally censored) any more than I think "Love Your Neighbour" should be banned (legally censored) - I'm not equating the two, just giving two examples. Having said that, I do think that there are extreme cases where music and other formats enter the "Inciting hatred" or "Inciting violence" categories, and in these cases there should be a legal mechanism for prosecution which could result in a conviction and censorship. The bar should be fairly high as freedom of expression is important.
Next, record labels should be pressured to remove songs like this from their catalogues.
Most difficult is persuading people not to listen to or watch misogynistic and similar content - I expect there's all sorts of nasty misogynistic pornography out there as well. It's a long slog to change opinions as to what is acceptable.
"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
can you tell us a musical category that should be banned?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostAs a starting point, I don't think it should be banned (legally censored) any more than I think "Love Your Neighbour" should be banned (legally censored) - I'm not equating the two, just giving two examples. Having said that, I do think that there are extreme cases where music and other formats enter the "Inciting hatred" or "Inciting violence" categories, and in these cases there should be a legal mechanism for prosecution which could result in a conviction and censorship. The bar should be fairly high as freedom of expression is important.
Next, record labels should be pressured to remove songs like this from their catalogues.
Most difficult is persuading people not to listen to or watch misogynistic and similar content - I expect there's all sorts of nasty misogynistic pornography out there as well. It's a long slog to change opinions as to what is acceptable.Comment
-
Melodic cover version by Ben Folds (991,396 views) ..Originally posted by minestrone View Post
boyeeeee!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostFair point.
no its not.
As you may know I am in favour of legalised prostitution that is the prostitutes choice. Same for the grid girls, they do have the problem that other people do not agree they should have their job. That at least is similar. Though personally calling the grid girls immoral is a bit of a stretch.
Calling them whores or bitches however or suggesting they are slapped up is obviously not acceptable.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ITS Plant-Tech v HMRC: a £569,175 VAT lesson for contractors Yesterday 05:23
- Contractor loan demands: Is W28 playing litigation roulette? Oct 9 16:01
- Sean’s Story: He settled his contractor loans. Then they were sold for about £10. Now he’s being chased for £131,000 Oct 8 05:12
- Contractors warned as HMRC petitions to wind up ‘FCSA umbrella’ MyPay Oct 7 05:06
- As JSL squeezes small umbrella companies, Healey must act Oct 6 03:43
- Healey’s Budget 2026 to-do list for IT contractor hiring Oct 5 05:05
- Contracting Awards 2026 winners: 2025’s victors refuse to let go Oct 2 06:23
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Sep 29 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Sep 28 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53

Comment