My initial point was broadly serious. Wikipedia has pretty strong laws about neutrality and point of view.
The page clearly is bat tulip crazy, yet seems not to have been questioned or downgraded.
The holocaust stuff is barking, yet slapping in a reference to a book by some Jewish critical studies professor that asks "was Jesus a Nazi" seems to be seen as enough evidence to keep the stuff on the page.
The page clearly is bat tulip crazy, yet seems not to have been questioned or downgraded.
The holocaust stuff is barking, yet slapping in a reference to a book by some Jewish critical studies professor that asks "was Jesus a Nazi" seems to be seen as enough evidence to keep the stuff on the page.
Comment