Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Michael Jackson documentary
Collapse
X
-
-
So you're saying that a paedo must interfere with every child they have opportunity to?Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
Most interesting that the kids who came into Jacksons life AFTER these pair such as Macauley Caulkin say nothing ever happened.
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostAlso, interestingly that years ago both denied any wrongdoing from Jackson. Could be argued they were still riding the Jackson gravy train at the time and only afterwards when they were left high and dry did they decide to change their stories to cash in.
That's the problem though isn't it?
See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Comment
-
"appropriate behaviour"Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostSo: he's not right in the head, has a predisposition to "entertain" young boys at his house (unattended), but knows what is and what isn't appropriate, i.e. knows not to molest or force them into any sexual situations.
I'm with William of Ockham on this one.
See You Next TuesdayComment
-
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostHis behaviour in his lifetime was certainly unacceptable.
Comment
-
People were not so aware of the abuse threat then. Recall an episode of Cagney & Lacey in early 90s where an adult innocently invited an upset child into his bed and nobody thought anything of it. They wouldn't show such a thing on TV now.Why does a non-retarded adult invite children (unaccompanied by parents) to their house?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
We have to be sure. I mean this is the greatest hook of all time.
Are we willing to throw all that away?Comment
-
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Today 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02
- Budget 2026: what UK housing needs (and doesn’t) Sep 7 06:52

Comment