Originally posted by ladymuck
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Calling all IPSE Members
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Sooo let's get this straight:
If I want to vote I have to trawl their forums, posts, articles, hope I don't miss anything and make a decision based on aggregate info I find myself rather than a few bulletpoints for/against from both sides or a single For article and single Against article? Have IPSE been smoking meth?!
My sub is due in January. I won't be renewing. The organisation seems to be a glory contest for people who wish to flatter themselves rather than instigate true change. I also notice I receive a lot of emails - mostly marketing guff for junk offers - that have nothing to do with the core of what most members likely want which is a robust organisation to progress contractor (no, not deliveroo folk; sorry) interests and help inform the government and masses at large of just what we do, how we do it and why we do it.
The main issue I can see is the IPSE board want sweeping changes, partially hidden and not 100% explicit versus a CC who are rightly protesting but want the removal of members of the board. On both sides: why the iron fists? Calm down and negotiate properly.
Won't be paying any more fees. Both sides can get to **** as far as I'm concerned.Comment
-
Because the board presented a done deal with NO possible negotiationsOriginally posted by contractorinatractor View Postwhy the iron fists? Calm down and negotiate properly.
.
The unpaid volunteer elected by the membership CC tried its hardest to engage but were rejected at every avenue
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
-
The history is much more complex than that. We could (in fact, should) ask why the BoD weren't engaging with the CC, for example. We could also ask what are the options different to the proposal on the table that will effect a proper long term solution to whatever the problem actually is. And so on...Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View PostBecause the board presented a done deal with NO possible negotiations
The unpaid volunteer elected by the membership CC tried its hardest to engage but were rejected at every avenue
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Were we really cynical we could ask why just over half the CC are fighting to retain a power they don't actually possess and why some CC have resigned.
The end result of all this is that nothing that IPSE does for its members is under any kind of threat, now or in the future. That seems to have got lost in the noise. In fact the only threat is the campaign to remove IPSE's chairman in protest, which will do far more harm politically than the governance changes under dispute, and will weaken their position with HMG significantly.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Bah!Originally posted by cojak View PostI would like to remind all posters that although this is General, there is still a modicum of moderation here.
No coming to blows please.
It was quite fun having the non IPSE posters standing round chanting "fight fight fight"....Comment
-
It can get weaker?Originally posted by malvolio View Postwill weaken their position with HMG significantly.Comment
-
It's far stronger than most believe, so yes, this is potentially damaging.Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostIt can get weaker?Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
I agree with mal on this - IPSE do have more influence than is immediately apparent, and the governance stuff is a distraction that, fortunately for those of us who are members, won't stop the staff from doing their job.Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt's far stronger than most believe, so yes, this is potentially damaging.
At the end of the day c 90% of the members won't care about which way the AGM vote goes and it probably won't make an obvious difference, but for those of us who do care it's important that people do realise what it is that they're voting for.Comment
-
yes, the force is strong with ipse wanOriginally posted by malvolio View PostIt's far stronger than most believe, so yes, this is potentially damaging.
Comment
-
+1Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostGosh IPSE sounds fun right now! Even worse than the Brexit firum?
I have a mind to join to access the forums...Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Today 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Yesterday 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23

Comment