Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Eamonn Holmes is now the target
Collapse
X
-
If they employ a stunt double, is that evidence for the right of substitution?Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here -
Originally posted by AtW View Post
HMRC wins IR35 case concerning BBC presenter | AccountingWEB
IR35 case loss turns the tables on HMRC | AccountingWEB
hmm it seems it depends how good your counsel are.Comment
-
Except in the latter case neither HMRC nor the contractor were represented by any counsel.Originally posted by vetran View PostHMRC wins IR35 case concerning BBC presenter | AccountingWEB
IR35 case loss turns the tables on HMRC | AccountingWEB
hmm it seems it depends how good your counsel are.
But well. you know... facts and stuff.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostExcept in the latter case neither HMRC nor the contractor were represented by any counsel.
But well. you know... facts and stuff.
If HMRC had engaged counsel do you think they would have lost?
we have just watched Mr Beckham's lawyer (Mr Loophole) spank the scam camera partnership (I believe in the correct use of speed cameras) on a technicality.Comment
-
They didn't though.Originally posted by vetran View PostIf HMRC had engaged counsel do you think they would have lost?
The rest is idle speculation by an unqualified individual.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostThey didn't though.
The rest is idle speculation by an unqualified individual.
indeed. I can't say professionally that HMRC are a bunch of amateurs with shaky laws, but it sure looks like it to me. YMMVComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Today 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Yesterday 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03

Comment