Child Maintenance threshold?

[GreenMirror]

You won't get an argument in this part of the forum. The good arguments, the ones where things really get going, those are reserved behind the paywall part of the site. I'm guessing you haven't paid for that.

It is based on suggested donations only though?

"£5 a month will keep a moderator in pellets to shoot at cyclists".
"£10 a month will keep a moderator in make up" (NAT can ask for whatever he wants, don't judge).

[Bean]

Not an argument. Keep bumping the thread though, we might still get one.

I'm assuming your point #5 of your rant post is 'your argument'...

Ultimately I know from personal experience and from the experience of many, many other men in the same position that the money clawed from me through the CMS is really not going to be spent on my children, but rather on Loubotins (or whatever they're called), handbags, meals at expensive restaurants and holidays. Tell me, fellow men, doesn't it make a ton more ******.g sense to hold onto as much as I can and spend it on my children directly?

No, It's better to give the maintenance required and if, as you suggest, the mother spends all the cash on herself...when the kids reach 18 you tell them exactly how much you were paying each month and ask them if they think she spent it all on them or herself.

You will have done the right thing in the eyes of many and the kids will understand what a money-grabber the mother is.
(Given, custody rights - you personally cannot be there for every time they want to go on holiday, have a restaurant meal , etc.- but the kids do deserve treats)

If she remarries, doesn't the maintenance requirement stop? - so think of a way to get her married off to some other guy who hasn't watched too many MGTOW youtube videos.

[gts]

Even if you were right, do you actually think anyone round here would care? Or that you are any less of a car crash of an individual?

I suspect the only reason the ban hammer has not been used yet is the mods are too busy laughing.

>care

Ahahaha, who are you trying to kid here? You clowns have made and continued a thread purely about me, whether it's to ridicule or not. Also it's funny you think *I'm* the car crash individual here. The fu.cking irony. I have won, no matter how you see it. I have triggered/baited an entire forum of butthurt simp soyboys and there's fu.cking NOTHING you can do about it, not even construct a half-assed counter argument to what I said earlier (because you know there isn't one).

And why would they ban me for asking a question and reacting to insults? That would be very tulip moderation if you ask me.

[gts]

You won't get an argument in this part of the forum. The good arguments, the ones where things really get going, those are reserved behind the paywall part of the site. I'm guessing you haven't paid for that.

I've never come across mods who get this salty on the internet, ever. Are you sure you're cut out for this?

Also paywalls are for failing news media and internet sites. Glad you made it clear how CUK (lmao very apt acronym) currently stands.

[Gibbon]

5. Ultimately I know from personal experience and from the experience of many, many other men in the same position that the money clawed from me through the CMS is really not going to be spent on my children, but rather on Loubotins (or whatever they're called), handbags, meals at expensive restaurants and holidays. Tell me, fellow men, doesn't it make a ton more ******.g sense to hold onto as much as I can and spend it on my children directly?

And there laid bare is your desolate morality, because she won't or might not do the right thing it excuses you from doing the right thing. An utterly false premise constructed by an envious and depraved mind, devoid of any civility, integrity or self worth.

Doing the right thing can never be wrong even if causes short term pain, it means when you get older and more reflective you can look in the mirror and say to yourself that even when things were tulipty I did the right thing. That beats all the grubby money you may have schemed away.

BTW I've been where you are when the CSA were more venal and for 14 years I never missed a payment or tried to artificially reduce it. There is no argument to doing the right thing, the alternative is self-corruption.

[gts]

I'm assuming your point #5 of your rant post is 'your argument'...



No, It's better to give the maintenance required and if, as you suggest, the mother spends all the cash on herself...when the kids reach 18 you tell them exactly how much you were paying each month and ask them if they think she spent it all on them or herself.

You will have done the right thing in the eyes of many and the kids will understand what a money-grabber the mother is.
(Given, custody rights - you personally cannot be there for every time they want to go on holiday, have a restaurant meal , etc.- but the kids do deserve treats)

If she remarries, doesn't the maintenance requirement stop? - so think of a way to get her married off to some other guy who hasn't watched too many MGTOW youtube videos.

That is totally defeatist, spineless and pathetic. I can act now to prevent the money from going up in smoke *now*. Why shouldn't I?

Also, the child maintenance requirement is different from alimony. CM continues until the child is 18. It doesn't stop with remarriage.

>MGTOW youtube videos

Ah, so you are a confirmed simp then. Thanks for clearing that one up for the audience.

[GreenMirror]

And why would they ban me for asking a question and reacting to insults? That would be very tulip moderation if you ask me.

There are very clear rules on what can be posted and what cannot be posted. If a mod doesn't like it, tough luck. This can involve simply a mod getting upset and taking it out on an innocent person.

There was the fantastic night when a mod banned another mod. Took admin a while to sort that one out.

[gts]

And there laid bare is your desolate morality, because she won't or might not do the right thing it excuses you from doing the right thing. An utterly false premise constructed by an envious and depraved mind, devoid of any civility, integrity or self worth.

Doing the right thing can never be wrong even if causes short term pain, it means when you get older and more reflective you can look in the mirror and say to yourself that even when things were tulipty I did the right thing. That beats all the grubby money you may have schemed away.

BTW I've been where you are when the CSA were more venal and for 14 years I never missed a payment or tried to artificially reduce it. There is no argument to doing the right thing, the alternative is self-corruption.

Another pathetic spineless boomer.

I freely admit to having no morals at all. Fu.ck morals. Morals are what boomers and simps like you have used against men like me for too long now, played on our generosity and better nature. No longer.

I do what is right for me and mine. Morals are a luxury only fools can afford. I am doing the right thing *right now*. I can spend the money that is directed away from the woman on my kids all by myself. I don't need a government department to do that for me.

[northernladuk]

Also paywalls are for failing news media and internet sites. Glad you made it clear how CUK (lmao very apt acronym) currently stands.

Admin was originally going to call it ContractorOK.

[Gibbon]

Another pathetic spineless boomer.

I freely admit to having no morals at all. Fu.ck morals. Morals are what boomers and simps like you have used against men like me for too long now, played on our generosity and better nature. No longer.

I do what is right for me and mine. Morals are a luxury only fools can afford. I am doing the right thing *right now*. I can spend the money that is directed away from the woman on my kids all by myself. I don't need a government department to do that for me.

Point proven.