Originally posted by Jog On
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No escaping the Russians
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostYeah, we'll send the aircraft carrier to the Baltic now, we can send the planes later (3 years I think it is now)Comment
-
I think Corbyn has finally overstepped the mark with this one, if the daughter ever wakes up the story will become substantially more emotive. He will get brutalised when that happens.
Also joyfully it impacts the SNP as well, they have came out fully backing May, this is deliberate to distance themselves Salmond who is pondering a return to the Scottish parliament. His show on RT has become a big embarrassment for them and Sturgeon clearly hates him now, the fat tulipe is costing them credibility.Comment
-
Although Salmond has a terrible past for this type of stuff calling the bombings of Milosevic's forces an "unpardonable folly".Comment
-
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archi...raqi-wmd-scam/
1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.Comment
-
6) Russia is known to play by the rules and never kills people it deems as traitors on foreign soil especially never ever using dangerous materials like Polonium-210, which as we all know was exclusively made in Area 51
7) Heil Putin!Comment
-
There is still no proof that the Russians dun it or that Putin was behind it and the big problem here, is that if it is found that it was someone outside of that sphere of suspicion then the British government are not only going to look even bigger twats than they already are, but relations with Russia will be 0 and I'm pretty sure some allies will be thinking twice about backing the UK in the future.
If the UK really want to hurt Putin, they should just cancel B****t“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
Originally posted by Batcher View Posthttps://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archi...raqi-wmd-scam/
1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.
He is about as credible as David Icke, it's the same gig he is playing, write some tulip to keep the morons happy and make an advertising revenue from a website.Comment
-
I don't understand the Russophilia the far left and far right have for the state now. Putin kills and imprisons his opponents with impunity, robs his people and threatens his neighbours on an almost daily basis. Is autocracy really that appealing?
People honestly doubt that he did this. Bonkers.Comment
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostThere is still no proof that the Russians dun it or that Putin was behind it and the big problem here, is that if it is found that it was someone outside of that sphere of suspicion then the British government are not only going to look even bigger twats than they already are, but relations with Russia will be 0 and I'm pretty sure some allies will be thinking twice about backing the UK in the future.
If the UK really want to hurt Putin, they should just cancel B****t
Russia had a successful doping campaign over the Olympics and it took whistleblowers - who are all now in fear of their lives - to reveal how it was done. These whistleblowers aren't innocent as they were either doping, administrating the drugs and/or involved in the testing. Oh and some of the people involved died from "accidents" or very young from "natural causes" even before they could talk.
So if you expect for clear evidence of Russian involvement to be given to the public now you are in cloud cuckooland."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment