One mans loss is another mans gain

[eek]

Leavers and to some extent remainers will gain from my extensive knowledge of economics which they have proven time and time again they have no idea about.

and exactly where have you proven to anyone that you actually have any knowledge of economics?

[Hobosapien]

Seems a bit harsh. Isn't maths covered under history seeing as there's no new maths being invented? i.e. 1+1 is still 2.

[motoukenin]

and exactly where have you proven to anyone that you actually have any knowledge of economics?

You have clearly not kept up to speed eek , I will give you exactly 10 mins to read the last 10 postings and then expect an immediate retraction of your statement, apology is optional.

[barrydidit]

apology is optional.

In General it's forbidden.

[motoukenin]

In General it's forbidden.

Yes but economics is a chaotic science , too many variables that can dictate an outcome. But not going into that just now , slow build up from a wrongdoers perspective is the way to go.

[SueEllen]

Yes but economics is a chaotic science , too many variables that can dictate an outcome. But not going into that just now , slow build up from a wrongdoers perspective is the way to go.

Economics is made up bulltulip.

[eek]

You have clearly not kept up to speed eek , I will give you exactly 10 mins to read the last 10 postings and then expect an immediate retraction of your statement, apology is optional.

I don't see anything about economics in this thread until you mention it in the post I replied to. What I see is a story about someone being fired long after they should have been due to the time background checks took.

There is possibly something else in the first post about someone earning some money to check the quality of the work done and something about you being renewed but I really don't see anything regarding economics in it. So exactly what economic theory do you think you are talking about?

[radish2008]

Plus you made me read your last 10 posts and now I feel sad.

[motoukenin]

I don't see anything about economics in this thread until you mention it in the post I replied to. What I see is a story about someone being fired long after they should have been due to the time background checks took.

There is possibly something else in the first post about someone earning some money to check the quality of the work done and something about you being renewed but I really don't see anything regarding economics in it. So exactly what economic theory do you think you are talking about?

Take a look at this :

http://http://www.independent.co.uk/...-a7874701.html

So you see that this was written a while ago and now we learn that this is actually happening at a faster rate , so mortgage rate rise in 2017 not 2018. Higher prices in shops due to low pound and now more expense when wages are dragging behind. So more wage increases and hey presto higher lending rates.

So in short mortgages will be costing more and from past history generally end up around inflation rate which is expected to be 3% so a 12 time increase in interest payments over 1 year.

Pretty bad hey ?

[eek]

Take a look at this :

http://http://www.independent.co.uk/...-a7874701.html

So you see that this was written a while ago and now we learn that this is actually happening at a faster rate , so mortgage rate rise in 2017 not 2018. Higher prices in shops due to low pound and now more expense when wages are dragging behind. So more wage increases and hey presto higher lending rates.

So in short mortgages will be costing more and from past history generally end up around inflation rate which is expected to be 3% so a 12 time increase in interest payments over 1 year.

Pretty bad hey ?

And what exactly does that have to do with what you posted earlier in this thread...