Originally posted by northernladyuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Problem gambling online
Collapse
X
-
-
It isn't.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostIt is difficult to see how allowing FOBTs is in the national interest.
It causes violence including injury and death in the betting shops who are staffed by one person."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Ah, that's why I mentioned that a few "one off" bets (not subject to the deposit) would be allowed, precisely so casual "Grand National" betters would not be excluded.Originally posted by woohoo View PostIf you require a gambler to deposit say £1000 then you are going to put that gambling website out of business. I would imagine the only gamblers to deposit 1k are the desperate ones, the casual player will simply go elsewhere. ...
But I agree my proposal probably wouldn't really be very effective.
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Comment
-
FOBTs on every down-at-heel high street has a much worse impact, I would guess.Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostAnd to think we nearly had super casinos too.Comment
-
You lack the intellectual capacity to pull off a sneering metropolitan élite pose.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostRelieving fools of their money quicker, so it's back in circulation and perhaps put to more productive use?
Comment
-
My dad used to tell me: you'll never see a rich gambler. And mostly we all know that's true.
But the government won't ban or discourage gambling, for the same reason it doesn't ban smoking altogether. If anyone believes the government gives a sh1t about broken homes or crime or anything bad linked to gambling, then I'm sorry to say they are mistaken. The only thing the government cares about is tax receipts.Comment
-
It isn't. I gamble when stressed and to be honest have had a gambling problem since I was 15 growing up around arcades in a sea side resort.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostIt is difficult to see how allowing FOBTs is in the national interest.
I had to self exclude myself from some online sites recently as after a bottle of wine I was making some horrendous bets / losses. I recently did a quick mental calculation and I've probably lost 250-300k minimum over the last 25 years.
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Quite probably.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostFOBTs on every down-at-heel high street has a much worse impact, I would guess.Comment
-
I bet you it's more than that.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostIt isn't. I gamble when stressed and to be honest have had a gambling problem since I was 15 growing up around arcades in a sea side resort.
I had to self exclude myself from some online sites recently as after a bottle of wine I was making some horrendous bets / losses. I recently did a quick mental calculation and I've probably lost 250-300k minimum over the last 25 years.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Comment