Originally posted by Dark Black
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hipster causes murder on a bike
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
He must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostCyclist Charlie Alliston guilty over pedestrian's death - BBC News
Mrs Briggs' family said they plan to campaign for tougher laws to stop pedestrians from texting.
Of course, motorised vehicles still free to kill cyclists e.g. No charges a year after Chris Boardman's mother killed - BBC News
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Comment
-
Manslaughter is a high bar, apparently, and there is no cycling equivalent to causing death by dangerous driving. It's a bit of a gap in the law which needs fixing.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostHe must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Comment
-
FTFYOriginally posted by Dark Black View PostThis message is hidden because Dark Black is pro-rape.


Comment
-
I hope something does come of this. His attitude warrants some kind of serious punishment. I understand that she was on her phone but the appropriate response to someone doing that is to slam on your brakes and avoid a collision.
The whole cyclist argument about 'not wanting to stop' does not apply to public roads. I don't care if you don't want to stop - or the momentum/speed you've built up. If the light goes red, and/or a pedestrian steps into the road you stop - end of..."Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
He had a brake and was not aware his bike was illegal. However he is a complete idiot. He was going to have an accident eventually.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostHe must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Maybe the judge is a cyclist and so agreed with the verdict?Comment
-
Originally posted by Dark Black View PostThis message is hidden because northernladyuk is on your ignore list.



If only everyone would....Comment
-
Comment
-
You really don't get it do you? The thing is that in London pedestrians are always jumping out in front of bikes, cars, lorries. Cyclists are silent - hopefully soon all vehicles will be electric then pedestrians will have to take more care.Originally posted by Jog On View PostI hope something does come of this. His attitude warrants some kind of serious punishment. I understand that she was on her phone but the appropriate response to someone doing that is to slam on your brakes and avoid a collision.
The whole cyclist argument about 'not wanting to stop' does not apply to public roads. I don't care if you don't want to stop - or the momentum/speed you've built up. If the light goes red, and/or a pedestrian steps into the road you stop - end of...
I also hope something comes of this. Pedestrians stop behaving like lemmings. Crucifixion would be nice.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella, PEO/GPP, or salaried EOR. Which is up 153% in 2026? Aug 6 08:43
- Outside IR35 isn’t making a comeback in 2026/27 — it’s something more complex Aug 5 04:55
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Aug 3 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59


Comment